Any scientists or engineers here that can flesh this out?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No engineer but on the face of it, it makes cold fusion sound like a done deal.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“the main stumbling blocks have been rigid scientific thinking concerning violation of conservation of energy laws” which like the Law of Gravity and other physical laws, cannot be repealed, no matter how much Obama wants to.
By chance, does the company happen to be seeking money from investors?
3 posted on
12/18/2009 8:29:23 PM PST by
MindBender26
(Never kick Dems when they're down. Wait 'till they're 1/2 way back up. You get much better leverage!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is claimed to produce more energy than it consumes at a ratio of 3:1Total BS.
4 posted on
12/18/2009 8:30:30 PM PST by
outofstyle
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5 posted on
12/18/2009 8:36:08 PM PST by
Frantzie
(Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It looks like a slickly packaged version of the perpetual motion machine, is all. Timing is suspicious...
Think I’ll put my money on entropy and the 2nd law...
7 posted on
12/18/2009 8:43:32 PM PST by
bigbob
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think I would also attribute this to a surfeit of Guinness coupled with a desire to upstage Bono...
8 posted on
12/18/2009 8:48:14 PM PST by
bigbob
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I first ran into this company about three years ago, and thought they had a fascinating (but radical) concept for producing electrical energy.
I bookmarked them, and checked back from time to time (with a skeptical eye). I eventually wrote them off as yet another scam, so I’ll admit that I’m surprised and even a bit delighted to see that they’ve finally delivered, and now have their device ready for testing by outside labs.
I look forward to how it goes with the independent testing.
9 posted on
12/18/2009 8:48:46 PM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’d love to be prooved wrong, but..... On the face of it the thing reads like BS.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If it truly delivers, they should have no need of outside funding, as all they need to do is sell electrical power to the power utility. They can buy 100KWH and send it back, getting paid for 300KWH of power, and so on.
11 posted on
12/18/2009 9:05:14 PM PST by
ikka
To: 2ndDivisionVet
[Orbo is based upon time variant magnetic interactions, i.e. magnetic interactions whose efficiency varies as a function of transaction timeframes.
It is this variation of energy exchanged as a function of transaction time frame that lies at the heart of Orbo technology, and its ability to contravene the principle of the conservation of energy. Why? Conservation of energy requires that the total energy exchanged using interactions are invariant in time. This principle of time invariance is enshrined in Noethers Theorem.]
Damn Shazam! Why it was right in front of my eyes! Any child could see that time variant magnetic interactions are the key to perpetual motion! I coulda been rich!
14 posted on
12/18/2009 9:16:09 PM PST by
FastCoyote
(I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Irish science? I'm sure it makes sense after a number of pints!
Don't worry, it's BS.
Many claims have been made of machines that generate more energy than they consume, none has ever panned out.
Some of them come with elaborate explanations, sometimes rather outlandish.
It goes against known laws of physics and most scientists consider it a waste of time.
I've heard that the patent office won't even look at such applications.
1. The burden of proof is on the inventor; Build a working model and demonstrate that it functions as advertised.
2. Allow independent verification, other teams must be able to build such machines. That's to make sure no cheating was going on.
15 posted on
12/18/2009 9:20:01 PM PST by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is claimed to produce more energy than it consumes at a ratio of 3:1, which has led to considerable skepticism from the scientific community. That would be an understatement.
16 posted on
12/18/2009 9:20:52 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Copenhagen Climate Summit; Shovel Ready)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
19 posted on
12/18/2009 9:50:57 PM PST by
smokingfrog
(Don't mess with the mocking bird! - http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I was under the impression that the Irish have been researching alcohol-based energy generation for centuries.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yes. It's a very sound and practical system. To explain it in layman's terms: The hyper cyclic energy drive magnets are differentially translocated during the Epsom Phase of magnetic flux saturation. Then as torque develops the uplift phase generation occurs and the inversion of resistance to persistence at a distance.....you're not understanding this are you? Another glass of the house's finest and I'll start over again. Leave the bottle on the table.
24 posted on
12/19/2009 12:11:57 AM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; SteamShovel; SolitaryMan; grey_whiskers; IrishCatholic; Darnright; Entrepreneur; ...
25 posted on
12/19/2009 3:33:45 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson