Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
He did not draw Jesus. He drew himself on the cross.

Assuming that your unsourced assertion is true; what is wrong with that? A Christian child identifying with Christ's suffering on the cross in a drawing sounds rather normal and healthy to me.

12 posted on 12/15/2009 4:49:19 PM PST by TigersEye (Sarah Palin 2010 - We Can't Afford To Wait)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

BRILLIANT:
He did not draw Jesus. He drew himself on the cross.

TIGERS EYE:
Assuming that your unsourced assertion is true; what is wrong with that? A Christian child identifying with Christ’s suffering on the cross in a drawing sounds rather normal and healthy to me.

FROM THE ARTICLE:
The boy’s picture portrayed a crucified Jesus with Xs over his eyes to indicate that he had died on the cross.


13 posted on 12/15/2009 5:13:37 PM PST by jessduntno (The skyrocketing federal pay is systematic, reaching every level in every agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

I did not say it was wrong. I was just correcting the story. They had to make it a little more than it was. The AP version of this story has a photo of the drawing. It has a sign on the cross which says “Jake.” I think it was a ridiculous thing for the authorities to do, but the article should state the facts accurately. Apparently they thought the facts they made up were more provocative.


15 posted on 12/15/2009 5:35:59 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson