That one is debatable on whether its because of an expressed opinion about a candidate or whether its because he chose to insult the owner of the site. Not clearcut enough that I'd consider it to be proof.
I believe the butt wiper, as we refer to him/her, was asserting the belief as others did that day that Rudy was the only one who could beat Hillary.
Though they all underestimated the stupidity of the liberal voters as 0 got the nomination.
There were several thousand more contentious posts after this one.
Whether it proves anything to anyone is up to others.
I spent the first thousands of posts in that thread, pointing out what each person had done to get banned.
But eventually, I changed my mind about it, I can’t find where but it was probably after the 1st 10,000 posts.
But I remember at the time how annoying some of the Rudy supporters were — not how they supported their candidate, but how they made up things about other candidates, or told us in April of 2007 that we had to pick Rudy or Hillary would win.
Well, we didn’t pick Rudy and Hillary didn’t win. And I for one, wish she had.