Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Knock It Off, Free Republic!
XenoHistoran ^ | 12/1/09 | XenoHistorian

Posted on 12/02/2009 9:21:09 AM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 521-534 next last
To: MamaB

“I truly did not like any of the candidates”

That’s the way I was, hope 2012 has at least two (need a choice) candidates with the wisdom and maturity of Cheney and Rumsfeld (and a strong resume of leadership and accomplishment) and Pres. Reagan (of course), there must be a few left.... hope they answer the call to duty.


261 posted on 12/02/2009 11:23:24 AM PST by Peter Horry (Those who aren't responsible always know best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: astyanax
LOL! Suffer from knee-jerk reactions often?

Yes, I just "IBTZ"ed Jim Rob's vanity reply, too.

It was nice knowing you folks.

262 posted on 12/02/2009 11:23:39 AM PST by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
If Romney wanted the support of pro-life conservatives, he should had his epiphany 10-15 years ago, not on the eve of his presidential run.

**********************

Exactly right. The timing was propitious, was it not?

263 posted on 12/02/2009 11:24:12 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

The trap you have fallen into and the problem Romney and his minions had was in saying that Reagan was like Mitt. Reagan was always against abortion. He made the mistake of loosening the definition for the health of the mother. But, he never became pro choice.

Mitt was for choice 100% and stated women had the absolute “right” to murder their children. Reagan never believed that. But Mitt did not just modify his position. Except for his current belief in embryonic stem cell research, he now claims to be completely pro-life. That’s a 180 degree turn, a from scratch, complete model change, not a modification.

To this day Mitt cannot explain what caused his opinion to change. He cannot even explain why he believes what he believes — a sure sign of someone making a change for expediency. Anyone making that drastic a change, going from completely pro choice/abort to completely pro life and wanting people to believe them, should have some viable reason other than ‘I want to get elected.’


264 posted on 12/02/2009 11:25:26 AM PST by Waryone (II Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: agromination
suggested that pissant, since he is tired of seeing EXACTLY what you guys insist doesn’t happen,

Show me where pissant said what you just accused him of.

Sure seems to be an awful lot of what you guys say isn’t so around here.

Like posting untruths like you just did?
265 posted on 12/02/2009 11:25:26 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: pissant; fieldmarshaldj; ejonesie22; Diogenesis; greyfoxx39; Virginia Ridgerunner; ...
Is anyone else getting sick and tired of the Mitt Romney bashing that goes on at the beginning of each new thread?

No!

The Romneybots and McCainiacs can all go get bent.

266 posted on 12/02/2009 11:25:36 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Look, lady, can you spell the “Van” in Vanilla?


267 posted on 12/02/2009 11:26:07 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! God save this great Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

The biggest problems were occuring because of the pushing and promotion of liberal, pro abortion candidates.

Putting on my asbestos undies here...

After seeing the videos of mitt speaking about abortion rights, I became pretty angry with some supporters of his that called rudy a liberal.

Glass houses...
268 posted on 12/02/2009 11:26:19 AM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: All
My response to the RINO Blogger telling FR to Knock Off the RINO Bashing and to all RINO Pushers
Dec 2, 2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 1:15:56 PM by Jim Robinson

269 posted on 12/02/2009 11:26:22 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (I am tired of being PC. It's time for torches, pitchforks, tar, feathers and GUNS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kralcmot

The libertarian position is that the government should not intervene. So, while Mitt would have had nothing to do with abortion in his own life — and counseled against abortion in his ecclesiastical positions and got slammed by the Dems for it — he pledged he would not try to change existing law in Mass, which allows abortion.


270 posted on 12/02/2009 11:27:45 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Yes, I just "IBTZ"ed Jim Rob's vanity reply, too.
I saw that. THAT was funny!
I apologize if you intended the one here to be funny also and I just missed it.
271 posted on 12/02/2009 11:29:04 AM PST by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I was asking a serious and respectful question. I was hoping you would take it that way.


272 posted on 12/02/2009 11:29:46 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Once you get The Great and General Court of the Commonwealth involved anything the price goes up, the service goes down, and Free Riders still ride free.


273 posted on 12/02/2009 11:31:00 AM PST by Little Bill (Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: astyanax
I apologize if you intended the one here to be funny also and I just missed it.

No, it was a knee-jerk reaction to something that look seriously zotworthy.

274 posted on 12/02/2009 11:32:27 AM PST by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

Maybe. But, I think in Massachusetts now more people are insured, and therefore paying their own way, than ever before.


275 posted on 12/02/2009 11:32:45 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

You sound like you don’t like it here at FR. Is there some reason, if so, that you’re still hanging around?

I hope you’re not hoping to change things to suit yourself. Might want to get used to disappointment if that’s the case.


276 posted on 12/02/2009 11:33:18 AM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Rockin,
You have been around here long enough to remember where active posters have tried to use FR to promote items that got the Owner upset. We had Arator decide the everyone had better get behind Buchannan, we had people decide that Bush didn’t have to win primaries, we had people decide that FR was going to get behind a first declared candidate, a popular Mayor that was a good leader on 9/11 and not even wait for conservatives to declare — dozens of examples.

Alll JR is doing by posting his threads is saying he isn’t going to let his site be a Rah-Rah site for the less than solid conservative candidates.

As far as standing up to group-think and posters acting like you were an idiot if you didn’t think (1)Flight 700 was taken out by a Clinton orderd missle, (2)Ron Brown was shot on the plane and the plane brought down on purpose, (3) everyone that doesn’t homeschool hates America, (4)Wesley Clarke burned Waco personally or any of the other more iconoclastic positions — well hell, that sort of stuff has been going on for the whole life of the site and you just have to firmly make a sensible case and most of that fades back into proper proportion (Unknown, true with reservations or false with reservations) within a few months.

If you feel you can’t post your flavor of conservative thought here, please post it somewhere. Conservatism is the salvation of our nation.


277 posted on 12/02/2009 11:33:44 AM PST by KC Burke (...but He has made the trains run on time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Wow. I forgot how on board I was with that thread, before it became clear the purge was not a joke.

I should reference my posts to that thread next time one of the mitt-haters calls me a liberal troll who hates conservatives.


278 posted on 12/02/2009 11:35:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

And insurance costs for businesses are going through the roof. Romney’s plan is a disaster.


279 posted on 12/02/2009 11:35:25 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Cool.

300 replies is not enough on this thread.

JR has to to increase the action!


280 posted on 12/02/2009 11:36:36 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Ack, is that the site with "Responsibility2nd"? Some weirdo. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 521-534 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson