Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MestaMachine
I don’t blame the judges. They are following the law. Judge Carter did the best he could to instruct the attorneys in the Keyes suit what they needed to do, but they ain’t having none of it. They have chosen publicity over necessity and I am really beginning to smell skunks all over the palce. (sic)
I agree about the lack of culpability on the courts. As to the rest of the comment, well, consider that, Attorney Berg evinced this footnote in Hollister almost a year ago but failed to discern what he had accomplished. Evidently, he just wanted to win the case, whatever that means. I have been urging people to use existing laws to expose the fraud, which means, filing complaints with state A'sG for swearing BO was qualified to get on the ballot without first ascertaining whether he was! But if you have read my blog, there is less 'sizzle' there than on those other sites. (One reader says, I am the 'steak.') But I have laid out the fraud - as far back as August 2008 I was advising people that the only way to stop BO would be to keep his name off the ballot - in detail. Simple yet elegant, as people have said.
25 posted on 11/23/2009 7:03:40 PM PST by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: jbjd

What do you mean “evinced?” What evidence is there that Berg was ever in the case? He never appeared other than his “paralegal” signing documents for him, the one. apparently, who now runs his website. Colonel Hollister’s opening brief says he and his team have left the case. He does solicit funds based on it.


34 posted on 11/24/2009 12:17:21 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: jbjd
“I agree about the lack of culpability on the courts.”

I appreciate your research and efforts to explain your findings to lawyers and also to non-lawyers like me.

I am troubled by Judge Robertson’s statement in the Hollister dismissal:

“The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court.”

It seems obvious to me that the controversy and possibility of an eligibility crisis rests on a lack of having the legal (not popular) definition of “natural born citizen” resolved by a court.

Judge Robertson could have just denied standing without all of his prejudicial comments directed at Berg and all of us who believe that Obama’s eligibility needs ultimately to be measured against a SCOTUS validated “natural born citizen” standard.

60 posted on 11/24/2009 12:22:05 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson