Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
Western Journalism ^ | July 18, 2009

Posted on 10/27/2009 4:33:18 PM PDT by Western Journalism

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-443 next last
To: mojitojoe
The "caucus" designation applies only to threads posted in the Religion Forum. When a thread is labeled "caucus" - for instance, "Catholic Caucus" - then only members of that caucus are allowed to post. In this example, only Catholics are allowed.

When a non-member posts, one of the regulars will ping or Freepmail me or file an abuse report. And the post is removed. The caucuses have been around for so long, they usually also kindly inform the non-member of the guidelines.

In addition to the usual guidelines that apply to religious debate (click on my profile page for more) - neither the article nor the reply posts on a caucus thread may speak in behalf of non-members. In this example, if the article or a reply post spoke about Protestant beliefs the caucus would be broken and the thread opened (caucus label removed) so that the Protestants could speak for themselves.

Again, the "caucus" designation only applies to threads posted on the Religion Forum. There are no caucuses in News/Activism, Bloggers, Chat, etc.

The pro-Lifers were thinking about declaring a "pro-Life Caucus" and posting some or all of their threads to the Religion Forum. They decided against it because articles posted to News/Activism get more traffic.

401 posted on 10/28/2009 12:37:06 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Thank you very much. A very clear explanation! :)


402 posted on 10/28/2009 12:39:46 PM PDT by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I don’t think so. For attacking “birthers” maybe. The issue, not Taitz. GO back and read my past posts, I usually stay away from the Orly threads. I defend the issue. I admire her tenacity, certainly NOT her skills. People that have no clue what the meaning of discrete is, drive me crazy. If I had some incredible evidence in my hands, I can assure you I would post it here, not would I speak to a reporter. I would get it where it needed to go and to someone that was silently building their case and gathering evidence. ;-)


403 posted on 10/28/2009 12:47:45 PM PDT by mojitojoe (“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.” - Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: John O

Therein lie some of the trouble.

-There are several pieces of evidence attesting to BHO’s Hawaiian birth. The COLB, newspaper announcements, his Indonesian school records, the statement of the Hawaiian Director of Health, just to name four. You may reject these pieces of evidence, but you cannot correctly claim there is no evidence.

-Over the course of his life BHO never claimed to be born anywhere other than Hawaii. Nor did his mother make any such claim.

-BHO’s grandmother never made any such claim. The recorded conversation where she supposedly said this was edited to make it look like this is was she meant.

Allowing public access to his birth records would satisfy some, but not all. Probably not even most. As very few of the folks who are worried about this would ever have or ever will support BHO anyway, he has little reason to do this. It certainly wouldn’t matter to those who take the stance that a Natural Born Citizen must have two citizen parents.

And no President ever has been required to provide the kind of proof that is now being demanded. This is something that definitely needs to be changed. Several Freepers are working on legislation for this. I am hopeful that they will be successful before the 2012 elections.


404 posted on 10/28/2009 12:49:11 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: danamco

So you don’t have contempt for me, but you do have contempt for me? Are your multiple personalities arguing with each other today?

“We likes BuckeyeTexan. He’s our friend.”

“BuckeyeTexan disgusts us! Doesn’t he, precious?”

“Yes! We will destroy BuckeyeTexan, won’t we, precious?”


405 posted on 10/28/2009 12:55:32 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: John O
"No. He has published a certificate of live birt. Which does not establish place of birth."

In fact it does. It says he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.

"Those announcments do not establish place of birth"

They were placed in the paper by the state agency that recorded the birth, which would only happen if the birth happened in the state.

"Then why is he filing that the case be thrown out of court before it is even tried? Seems to be "fighting release" to me."

No, it isn't the same as fighting release. Remember, as far as the Obama team is concerned, it already has been released. That some people won't accept that doesn't change anything.

If someone sues you, you have to respond. You are going to respond according to the proper procedure. The court first must decide issues of jurisdiction and standing, so that's what the filing are about. It's not Obama's lawyers that make those rules.

"The suit is about being able to look at the evidence."

That's not what the suits are about.

"Far as I know they have."

No prior president has been required to produce a birth certificate in order to serve. None have done so.

"Check their presidential libraries or the clerk of courts in their birthplaces. None of them are sealed."

What may be in their libraries after the fact is not the question. The question is about what they produced to prove they were eligible to be president in the first place.

406 posted on 10/28/2009 1:00:19 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

How about to grow up and act as an “individual” adult, and NOT a cry-baby???


407 posted on 10/28/2009 1:46:21 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
So you don’t have contempt for me, but you do have contempt for me? Are your multiple personalities arguing with each other today?

As a Christian that you profess to be, you probably have heard or maybe used it yourself: "We don't hate the homosexuals, but we hate their sins."!!!

Are your mind able to understand the similarities???

Got to run and see Glenn Beck now!!!

408 posted on 10/28/2009 1:55:14 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Are your mind able to understand the similarities???

All your similarities are belong to us. You're really a lot of fun. I like Glenn Beck too.

409 posted on 10/28/2009 2:03:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
I think the author of the story was trying to point out that any adult can legally apply for their own BC in the state of Hawaii if there hadn’t been one previously filed

That was news to me..

410 posted on 10/28/2009 2:27:32 PM PDT by vigilante2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2

You may find the information on this website, compiled by Freeper Beckwith, of interest:

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaCOLB.htm


411 posted on 10/28/2009 2:38:28 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Wait a minute, are you saying Western Journalism has contributed to the Freepathon but they have not responded to their own post?

That seems a little improbably, doesn’t it?


412 posted on 10/28/2009 2:51:42 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thank you Fred I’ll bookmark that..

I’m not here as much as many of you are so sometimes I miss something


413 posted on 10/28/2009 2:52:32 PM PDT by vigilante2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

No. Review the thread to which I posted a link. It had nothing to do with “Western Journalism.”


414 posted on 10/28/2009 2:59:07 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

And no President ever has been required to provide the kind of proof that is now being demanded. This is something that definitely needs to be changed. Several Freepers are working on legislation for this. I am hopeful that they will be successful before the 2012 elections.


I agree with you that the mandate needs to be included to provide for certification of NBC in order to be sworn in as POTUS. My question to you is do you know whether this work is being done as a state legislation process or at the national level for say certification to the Electoral College?


415 posted on 10/28/2009 3:05:44 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: deport

I understand that all efforts are at the state level right now.

But then, only a few states (or one big one) actually need to do this for it to be effective.


416 posted on 10/28/2009 3:07:13 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

Thanks. I agree the state level is the proper place to have the documentation filed when the place on the ballot is filed for. Even if only one gets it in place and the info is public then that should basically at least provide some assurance of the NBC issue to others.


417 posted on 10/28/2009 3:09:51 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: deport
Personally, I'd also like to see some national legislation making a clear definition of NBC.

Two citizen parents or otherwise. But something definite.

418 posted on 10/28/2009 3:20:08 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
“Yes! We will destroy BuckeyeTexan, won’t we, precious?”

We don't need to do that, because you yourself are doing a fabulous job in reaching that point!!!

419 posted on 10/28/2009 3:58:28 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: danamco

You’re so much fun. I just love your extra question marks and exclamation points. It really emphasizes your crazy statements.


420 posted on 10/28/2009 4:11:32 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-443 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson