Ok, imagine... now... suppose... then... now... and then....
Can’t follow mind-warp trail, losing ability to concentra, umm, concentrate.
Way too much gobbledygook to read, and way too poorly written. What little I did read, the guy comes across as petulant and self important.
Never heard of him. Is he colluding with the Chicago papers? That in itself is quite an indictment. And cause for concern about a direct link to the corrupt Chicago (Hate) White(y) House.
“In fact, one person familiar with things she said at the time said that if Gaynor knew everything she said about him at the time he’d never work with her.”
Good grief! Is ths what passes for journalism at the Sun-Times?
Wow! What an interesting article. I think what the author is saying is that Nixon was right to target the Washington Post after Woodward and Berstein made a national hero out of an anonymous source, “Deep Throat” and went on to write a book about it and even made a movie about themselves. And they were “journalists” not just a “blogger” like Malkin.
Ah, so that is what this is all about, Volpe. You love to bash on conservative bloggers for nonsensical reasons. Probably out of raw jealousy, if this telling admission is any indication.
Volpe’s spiel reminds me of Navin R. Johnson:
“And that’s it and that’s the only thing I need, is this. I don’t need this or this. Just this ashtray. And this paddle game, the ashtray and the paddle game and that’s all I need. And this remote control. The ashtray, the paddle game, and the remote control, and that’s all I need. And these matches. The ashtray, and these matches, and the remote control and the paddle ball. And this lamp. The ashtray, this paddle game and the remote control and the lamp and that’s all I need. And that’s all I need too. I don’t need one other thing, not one - I need this. The paddle game, and the chair, and the remote control, and the matches, for sure. And this. And that’s all I need. The ashtray, the remote control, the paddle game, this magazine and the chair.
[walking outside]
And I don’t need one other thing, except my dog.
[dog barks]
I don’t need my dog.
This is some odd attempt to say Michelle is, in a minor way, aiding someone whose allegations against ACORN, although tacitly legit in the eyes of ACORN’s own lawyer, are possibly trumped up a little, but there’s no way to know.
At least that’s what it seems from the blogger’s own words.
Crazy!
Who is this author? He can’t write himself out of a paper bag yet has the arrogance to hate on Malkin. His logic doesn’t even follow a coherent path.
That is kind of funny though, thanks for posting.. it is fun to see how the left gets their panties in a wad over Malkin and company.
Guinness World Record
Most Words Typed Before Passing Out Drunk
"Kind of hard to understand but few spelling errors."
They don't know who Anita Moncrief is. It's entirely improper to identify her as a whistle blower and not identify her theft. That must be done each and every time because you don't know how much your audience knows.
That would be akin to saying every article about someone has to mention everything they have ever done.
This is one of the most lame-arsed line of attacks I have ever seen. And all because Malkin won't publish you on Hot Air. What a whiner. I can see why she won't even bother responding to your lame attack.
Did she start with herself first? Of course, everyone should see the biggest irony of all by now. Malkin has made a killing on the book, Culture of Corruption. The same person that condemns President Obama for a culture of corruption is embroiled in her own. Nothing she accuses Obama of doing is any worse than the complete and total culture of corrupton she's engaging in herself.
You can't be serious. Because Malkin doesn't mention a stolen credit card by a whistleblower, she's just as corrupt as the Obamas and the Obama Admin.
You either are a complete and utter fool or a depraved hack who will attack your betters because they won't let you into their circle. Probably both.
Absent that, fiscon1 AKA LameRepetitor, here's a reply.
Dear Jackass,
since you seem to think it's OK to keep posting the same thing, I'm reposting my original reply to you as well.
a href=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2366374/posts
The Culture of Corruption Between Michelle Malkin, Michael Gaynor, and Anita Moncrief The Provocateur ^ | 10/19/2009 | Mike Volpe
Posted on Tue 20 Oct 2009 03:08:52 AM EDT by fiscon1
OK. I have read your infantile "blog" from start to finish and 1) don't see any corruption 2) don't see anything particularly interesting and 3) now fully understand why MM doesn't feature you in her Green Room.
You have no writing talent to speak of.
Here are some hints: English is a language made up largely of words. Use good, strong, tactile words in ways that make people want to read your column. It really isn't enough that you personally find it remarkably clever -- who do you think you are, Andrew Sullivan? Next, when you tell a story, you must actually make it interesting. If you can't do that, at the very least it should be about something -- and no, writing a teaser headline really doesn't count when there is no there-there in the putative "blog."
Thanks for confirming why your web page belongs in our kerplunk buckets. You will never get another curious hit from us again. Maybe 4chan/b/ can use you. Hey, they have powers; if they can turn Chocolate Rain viral there may be some hope for your rancid little hit piece.
FRegards.
FRed
Kind of reminds me of David Brock who became a born again Liberal after he came out of the closet.
This is a tempest in a teapot - a waste of electrons and bandwith and everyone’s time. There’s no there there.