“Calling him: a nut; I’ve heard him.”
I’ve been following him for the couple of years and he has been very accurate.
He may be on some conspiracy show, but he is also on Fox and CNBC (or CNBS), not that that makes him legitimate. Let me put it this way, he’s more accurate than Bernanke and Geithner have been.
As Jim Rogers says about Bernanke and company “if I had the same track record of mistaken calls, you’d stop having me on”
Celente publishes a newsletter (which I get) so he has a history. Suggesting that somehow he has cherry-picked his successes is inaccurate. He is legitimate.
Celente publishes a newsletter (which I get) so he has a history. Suggesting that somehow he has cherry-picked his successes is inaccurate. He is legitimate.Assertion without cite; an unobjective observation.
No one is 'that good'.
A neutral third party needs to take a look at his actual record.