I give it 2/5 Howler Monkeys. The breathless run-on sentences make me think it might be a parody.
Posted on 10/01/2009 8:29:01 PM PDT by arkadyka
De Facto leader of the 9/11 Truther movement has spoken and predictably greeted as Nostradamus, with impeccable ratings on his newest YouTube video. Ron Paul speaks in platitudes on a regular basis commonly interweaving his opinions and facts in such a manner that distinguishing the two becomes a chore. His followers seldom question the man as doing so would border sacrilege and like rabid zealots distribute Paul's speeches in hopes the rest of us bask in his wise glory. Sure, Paul has plenty of great ideas and he is probably the only prolific small government politician with a modicum of media exposure, but his legion of followers are youthful for a reason. Paul appeals to their Utopian and rebellious nature in similar fashion Obama captured the other idealistic liberal youth vote, albeit for entirely different reasons. One must always question and be aware of Paul's approach, his absolutist and often simplistic angles that can both inspire and dull the senses. Just like he can stand in front of Congress and state with egotistical certainty that "Israel created Hamas", he can accuse America of intervening into Iran's peaceful nuclear approach. When a man is willing (either knowingly or not) to level such inane charges against Israel what precludes him from leveling equally absurd charges about anything else, knowing perfectly well that his pack of hyenas will disseminate information at lightening speed lauding him in the process.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightcondition.com ...
R-U-N Paul needs to run away - what a waste of skin.
Ron Paul comes from the JIMMUH CAHTA School of FOREIGN POLICY!!
we dont need to be like liberals and call someone we disagree with names. lets not act like the left on this one. i disagree with paul on this issue but am 100% with him on the federal reserve and limited government. so lets refrain from name calling and just post what you disagree and why you disagree lets not become the left please. call obama what ever you want but ron paul fights the good fight most of the time.
I dont think he was calling him names, he is simply pointing out that he smacks of Carter’s appeasement.
But he just happens to be an idiot about foreign policy. In that regard, he may as well be a "truther".
I am reasonably sure he is a truther, but cannot prove it.
Washington is becoming the world’s largest outdoor insane asylum.....
That is...very profound.
I have many libertarian leanings and there are places where we should not intervene, perhaps Paul believes conceptually that even holding such resolutions is against the spirit of our federal government. He is Dr. No after all...but despite my support for Israel, I can sort of see where he is coming from.
If things go South may he be among the first to “glow in the dark”.
I’ll stick to the facts... ron paul is an ANTI SEMITE, a KOOK, and a MORON. His Foreign Policy stance is going to get us KILLED, and I’m not supposed to warn you that this man is a KOOK???
When in a BAR FIGHT.. you fight WORSE than your opponent... I”m sick and tired of you RINO’s with your “WE’RE above such things”.. that IDIOTIC ATTITUDE got US HUSSEIN NOBAMA...
So if you’re going to fight WITH ME... DO SO.. if NOT... Get out of the way, and may the CHAINS of your new master lie Lightly on your BACK
call me a liberal... DUH!!!
Ron Paul Lover is probably at the abuse button... MOMMYRATOR, HE’s BEING MEAN TO ME ..he called me a RINO!!!
Troll bait thread=epic FAIL
Wanking about “interweaving opinions and facts in such a manner that distinguishing the two becomes a chore.”
Then the first “fact” is that Ron Paul is leader of the Truther movement when he’s not even a truther. That’s followed up by an article laced with adjectives and adverbs like a true liberal. Uggh, hurry up and donate money to Romney’s campaign then shut up already. Or maybe cross-dressing Giuliani is more your style.
What the hell are you talking about? There is only one troll here an I am responding to him.
I read the first paragraph and I didn’t see any fact that supported the title of your post. Any high schooler knows that the first paragraph should introduce the premise of an article, and I’m curious to know if the title is even addressed elsewhere. It’s not much worth reading on, because the author is clearly deceiving people into reading this in the first place.
So why bother to post something like this? It’s dishonest.
I give it 2/5 Howler Monkeys. The breathless run-on sentences make me think it might be a parody.
The article is dishonest, yet you only read the first paragraph. *blink*
You not only stick to facts, you know where the shift key is and how to use it.
“;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.