The listed COLB was from FactCheck, not from the Obama Admin. to begin with. Next it was shown forensically to be a fake. Next the words from Hawaii were parsed, they were lawyerized, they never stated they had the long form birth certificate, just that they had the origonal COLB. We know that in 1961, there were 4 different ways to get a Certification (not Certificate) of Live birth, and 3 of those 4 ways do not involve being born in the Hawaiian Islands.
I can provide links for them refuting each item I specified if you can’t find them.
If you are so skeptical of, say the official pronouncements by the state of Hawaii, why would you be so trustful of a single document without any official support that is being presented by an individual that may have a history of fraud?
No. Factcheck posted images of the document provided by the Obama campaign.
"Next it was shown forensically to be a fake."
No, it hasn't been. A couple of internet crackpots tried to make that claim. No actual expert has made such a claim.
"Next the words from Hawaii were parsed, they were lawyerized, they never stated they had the long form birth certificate, just that they had the origonal COLB. We know that in 1961, there were 4 different ways to get a Certification (not Certificate) of Live birth, and 3 of those 4 ways do not involve being born in the Hawaiian Islands. I can provide links for them refuting each item I specified if you can’t find them."
You are repeating birther distortions. None of them make the existing COLB go away, or change the fact that it says he was born in Honolulu.
How do "we" know this?
I can provide links for them refuting each item I specified if you can’t find them.
Please do. Only don't post links to blogs. Post links to actual, verfiable sources. Berg's blog telling me that there are four ways to get a Hawaiian CoLB holds no more water than you telling me this. Certainly, there have to be more reputable sources than "It's posted on so and so's blog" if you expect people to accept this claim as fact.