A. We knew the court accepted the document. It had its stamp on it.
b. We suspected, and now confirmed that it was not Rhodes who sent it.
c. We still do not know who wrote it, Rhodes or the acquaintance.
d. We do not know if the acquaintance acted on Rhodes behalf or not. The clerk seems to think so. But then Judge Land does not have anything other than low regard for Taitz.
The only “new” information is that the court agreed to receive it, even though we knew they did per the stamp.
We are in the same place as friday, but you are jumping to all kinds of conclusions.
Has a clerk ever been punked before?
The courts have accepted obviously bogus documents that Orly has filed. Doing so doesn't inandofitself imply that the court accepts those documents as valid or authentic. In Larry's conversation with Tim Frost, the court clerk states that the court accepted the letter as authentic. That is indeed updated news and something we didn't know before.
c. We still do not know who wrote it, Rhodes or the acquaintance.
Correct. We don't know for sure that the aquaintenance authored the letter for Rhodes. However, we can make an educated guess that he did based on the following:
If the court clerk was sufficiently convinced that this acquaintance was representing CPT Rhodes, then he must have obtained enough details from him to become convinced.
Is it possible that he was punk'd? Certainly.
Is it likely? No, because the letter provides significant details about how CPT Rhodes discovered that the motion to stay had been filed and promises an original, signed letter to follow.