The courts have accepted obviously bogus documents that Orly has filed. Doing so doesn't inandofitself imply that the court accepts those documents as valid or authentic. In Larry's conversation with Tim Frost, the court clerk states that the court accepted the letter as authentic. That is indeed updated news and something we didn't know before.
c. We still do not know who wrote it, Rhodes or the acquaintance.
Correct. We don't know for sure that the aquaintenance authored the letter for Rhodes. However, we can make an educated guess that he did based on the following:
If the court clerk was sufficiently convinced that this acquaintance was representing CPT Rhodes, then he must have obtained enough details from him to become convinced.
Is it possible that he was punk'd? Certainly.
Is it likely? No, because the letter provides significant details about how CPT Rhodes discovered that the motion to stay had been filed and promises an original, signed letter to follow.
Orly’s response:
I don’t know if this letter came from her, since she is in Iraq now and the Office -max store from where it came, states that they don’t send faxes for customers. The signature on her notarized letter from Kansas and this letter looks different.
Regardless, whether it is her or not, there is no ground for accusations. She authorized me to proceed with the legal action. Motion for reconsideration is a routine procedure and attorney is not required to get an additional consent from the client. Any attorney will confirm that. That is particularly true in exigent circumstances like these.
It appears Connie was pressured by the military. It appear to be a concerted effort to quash all free speech, particularly any legal challenges to Obama’s legitimacy, Attorney Hemenway in DC was threatened with sanctions of $10,000, I was threatened with sanctions. Connie Rhodes was threatened with high costs of litigation to be paid to the Department of Defense and Department of Justice. It is possible that this letter was written to avoid paying high litigation costs.
The most important question is still on the table: why would the judge levy $10,000 in sanctions instead of instructing Obama to produce a real Hospital birth certificate with a name of the hospital name of the doctor and signatures , so we can locate this birthing file? Why go to such extend? The only answer is: that the administration is scared, they know they have nothing to show for except for the piece of JPG garbage that Obama posted on the Internet (no name of the hospital, no name of the doctor).
Well, all good that ends good. This threat of sanctions gives me an opportunity to demand rule 11 discovery and get all of Obama’ records through the back door
Orly Taitz DDS Esq