Posted on 09/11/2009 11:05:25 AM PDT by jacknhoo
“August 25 though 28, “
It should read “through” not “though”
Yep, it sure does, and that simply strengthens the idea that they went back to the wordprocessor, ctrl-x-ed out the line on constitutionality, and reprinted.
Ah - Danged corrective lenses “thew” me off the trail - made me see what wasn’t there!
I too can’t find the typo. Anyone?
If I had a nickel every time someone said, “hey, use the search function” “or duplicate post” I’d have more money than Christopher Dodd, Barney Frank combined. Perhaps more than the crabs of the denizens of Baltimore ACORN. You get the idea, a whole bunch of nickels.
Some much older selected sample comments from valiant souls who didn’t mind a duplicate post:
“Not everyone reads all the posts everyday. As I didn’t see this article before, I appreciate the repost.” — commandofrank
“This is the first time I have seen it.” —MamaB
“Lighten up, Francis.
I hadn’t seen it.” — teenyelliott
“I did look....oh well...sometimes a thread like this needs to be repeated....dont want to miss this info.”
—blasater1960
“Sorry, Mac, but I’m the center of the universe and I haven’t seen the previous 2386 times it was posted. Some of us have a life! So buzz off.” —Publius6961
“I don’t have the luxury of being on FR all day, and this is the FIRST time I saw this. I’ll bet you’re a lot of fun at a party.” —kitkat
Finally, advice from the MODS, trying to herd cats:
Way too many duplicates and vanities. Please read - again. (Welcome Newbies)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179671/posts
see #7 by Izzy Dunne
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1179671/posts?page=7#7
Does anybody know is South Carolina's election law requires a "qualification" clause or doesn't? Or that the Certification of Nomination without the qualification clause was sent to all fifty states regardless of their election laws requiring same?
ex animo
davidfarrar
That’s because the bain will automaically read words and comprehend the meanig as long as the firt and last letters are included. LOL.
Canada Free Press is the front for Douglas Haggman, Founder of Northeast Intelligence Network, or “NEIN,” for “no” in German. “CFP” intentionally stole work produced on my blog, without accreditation, and are reaping the notoriety for this usurpation. My ire vests not in this theft of intellectual property but rather, in the knowledge that this unscrupulous group will unjustly benefit from the caliber of the work, my work. And people will tend to credit other tripe that comes out of this group, assuming it has any intrinsic value whatsoever, which it does not.
Way back in December 2008, Justin Riggs was contacting state elections officials all over the country to obtain Certifications of Nominations. HI sent back both the DNC and RNC Certifications, which he posted, along with the cover letter from elections officials. A blogger who has helped me on several projects, including distributing the memorandum I wrote trying to resolve the issue of standing confronted by Plaintiffs in federal court, by proposing military Plaintiffs who could survive a Motion to Dismiss; thought I might be interested in Justin’s work and emailed the link. Already familiar with the SC Certification, as soon as I saw the HI Certification, I noticed the extra line regarding BO’s Constitutional qualification. Then, I looked at the cover letter from HI elections officials; this contained a cite to Hawaiian Revised Statutes. I checked with Justin; no, he hadn’t cited this law to obtain the Certifications. So, I looked up the law. And sure enough, this was the requirement that party officials must Certify the candidate for POTUS is Constitutionally eligible for the job. (I also noticed there was no “Received” stamp on the Certification from HI, as well as the signature anomaly. But none of these details was material to creating any cause of action that could halt the Congressional ratification of the EC vote; or, after such ratification, that could prompt Congress to initiate Impeachment proceedings.)
You will find these documents posted and/or referenced throughout my blog, beginning last December, and recently highlighted in an article I posted on August 13, “IF DROWNING OUT OPPOSING FACTS IS un-AMERICAN THEN, IGNORING UNPLEASANT FACTS IS un-AMERICAN, TOO.” The distinction is again pointed out in the just published “MODEL COMPLAINT OF ELECTION FRAUD TO STATE A’sG.” Notice, CFP did not reveal the provenance of information they just ‘published’ about the Certifications, or provide an explanation as to why it took them so long to ‘find’ this information and realize its significance.
http://jbjd.wordpress.com
Its IMPORTANT enough to post another 1000 times in the next Thirty Hours! maybe someone in power will finally notice the massive Fraud perpetrated upon The UNITED STATES of AMERICA and Our CONSTITUTION!....
Perhaps you could post your own article/articles regarding this matter here on FR either in “breaking news” or under “front page news”.
Don’t you mean “LL”? ;-P
btt, thanks jbjd, it looks like this JB Williams fella just copied you, I guess credit should be given where it is due. So what you are saying is that Hawaii basically has a different wording requirement than other states? With your original requests, did you receive any from other states?
I would suggest posting a new thread on your original topics so credit goes where it is due and your other information is posted.
Why would any state take out that part, especially if it is not required. If it doesn’t matter, why not leave it in?
This story is far too important to relegate it to a single posting. Like any earth-shattering news, it should be posted at the top of every hour on this website, and every other conservative website and forum.
I saw the very first posting of this article, but many others are only just now seeing post number five. And, I can guarantee you that if it's posted ten times, that many will only be seeing it for the first time, then.
I hope that the mods leave them all up.
Too limit exposure and lay the groundwork for plausible deniability. I have been reading where, of all places, Hawaii requires it. I have not heard of any other state, though I suspect there are others.
I think even here in this site this subject matter has been discussed before and a message was soon posted, carefully explaining that all Nancy Pelosi did was to certify that Barack Obama was the DNC’s nominee for President, nothing more.
Sadly, I don’t know enough about the process to be able to tell you if this is a common practice or not. Perhaps someone with a little more knowledge in this area may shed some light on the subject. But we shouldn’t go off half-chocked when we, collectively, know so little about the subject matter and there are other plausible explanations at hand.
ex animo
davidfarrar
document bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.