Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Van Jones (non) feeding frenzy [NBC, ABC, CBS - Van Jones Who?]
Washington Examiner ^ | 9-4-09 | Byron York

Posted on 09/05/2009 10:09:40 PM PDT by joinedafterattack

From a Nexis search a few moments ago[9-5-09]:

Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.

If you were to receive all your news from any one of these outlets, or even all of them together, and you heard about some sort of controversy involving President Obama's Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, your response would be, "Huh?"

If you heard that that adviser, Van Jones, had apologized for a number of remarks and positions in the recent past, your response would be, "What?"

And if you were in the Obama White House monitoring the Jones situation, you would be hoping that the news organizations listed above continue to hold the line -- otherwise, Jones, who is quite well thought of in Obama circles, would be history.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: beck; glennbeck; obama; valeriejarrett; vanjones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: elizabethgrace

If it isn’t in the New York Times, it must not have happened.


41 posted on 09/05/2009 10:54:05 PM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
From a Nexis search a few moments ago[9-5-09]:

And even now there are a dozen or more sources in Google News search that have picked up the resignation. However, all but one parrotted the standard whitewash: All Van Jones did was called Republicans bad names and signed some silly old petiton. Nothing, I mean NOTHING about his associations, his marxist connections or racist diatribes ANYWHERE! Sickening and subversive bunch in the dinomedia. Their day is coming also...

42 posted on 09/05/2009 10:55:01 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The powers of persuation are extremely important in winning the battle. When people can “relate”, they wake up.

For example: Someone complaining about high gas prices.

Casually mention that if we were energy independent and were allowed to use our own resources, our gas prices would be so much less. Then mention our superior technology being the most “environmentally friendly” compared to other countries.

It makes some of them think about it.


43 posted on 09/05/2009 10:55:33 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

I love that photo and was amused to happen upon this statue on St. Armand’s Key near Sarasota a couple of weeks ago.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XRHG0RN6KeI/Sn3cdrfK4PI/AAAAAAAAAEc/4xBNNXQ4dwU/s1600-h/100_1593.JPG

I haven’t downloaded our pics to photobucket yet, so I hope I’m not trampling any toes posting someone else’s pic.


44 posted on 09/05/2009 11:00:08 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Van's under the bus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steven33442

I guess the NYT is waiting for the text from the White House.


45 posted on 09/05/2009 11:01:13 PM PDT by elizabethgrace (Looking for Van Jones? Check under the bus....lol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

Isn’t the Ostupid regime just full of “historic moments” according to the media?


46 posted on 09/05/2009 11:23:40 PM PDT by Tempest (Placing Americans people before foreign corporate interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

It’s the Marxist Media. Pure and simple.


47 posted on 09/05/2009 11:50:19 PM PDT by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Lamestream anchorcritter: “A top advisor to President Obama resigned last night because of a controversy you don’t need to know about.”


48 posted on 09/06/2009 12:01:32 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

All those outlets know all about it. There appears to be a tacit agreement between them and the administration: Get rid of him quick under cover of darkness and holiday so we aren’t forced to report on the situation. We’ll sweep it under the carpet and the subject will go away.


49 posted on 09/06/2009 2:46:11 AM PDT by bustinchops (Teddy ("The Hiccup") Kennedy - the original water-boarder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

And as of now, almost 6AM EST, it’s not even mentioned on CNN online.


50 posted on 09/06/2009 2:53:41 AM PDT by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
The New York Times finally does put up a story on Sunday, September 6: White House Adviser on ‘Green Jobs’ Resigns.

(They also had a small blurb buried in the Caucus blog yesterday, September 5.)

51 posted on 09/06/2009 3:03:57 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Talk about the power of the “new media.” This was ENTIRELY due to Glenn Beck and the internet.


52 posted on 09/06/2009 4:38:29 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steven33442

It is in the 6 Sept 2009 NYT but on page A17 of the politics section. It basically says this good man, Van Jones, resigned because of an evil Republican victory.


53 posted on 09/06/2009 5:28:36 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money to spend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

You must remember that he is bald and it is not polite to attack a person so handicapped


54 posted on 09/06/2009 5:31:11 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khital)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Looks like the Washington Post finally did a blog about the Van Jones disaster.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/09/06/van_jones_resigns.html

I guess Van Jones did not get Obama’s promised “EXTENSIVE VETTING” that he bragged about to the Washington Post.

Potential Obama Appointees Face Extensive Vetting

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/17/AR2008111703037.html


55 posted on 09/06/2009 5:34:59 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money to spend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: euram

I think I hear a distant bugle.

I think the cavalry is coming.

Rush will be back Tuesday


56 posted on 09/06/2009 5:35:01 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khital)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
......I guess Van Jones did not get Obama’s promised “EXTENSIVE VETTING” ......

He was billed as Green Czar. We don't know why he was really there.We don't know what he was really doing or advising.

He is far to Communist and radical just to be the Green Jobs adviser.

57 posted on 09/06/2009 5:37:53 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khital)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Obama lied, Jones denied.


58 posted on 09/06/2009 5:39:11 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Well, that is after the fact, of course. Obama announced this at 12:30 in the morning, so I don’t know how they were able to print it in today’s paper. Frankly, I don’t think they did.

They should be ashamed of themselves. But they won’t be.


59 posted on 09/06/2009 5:47:43 AM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

This is just the beginning of the story, not the end. We need to see how Jones got so close to Obama. Who greased the skids?


60 posted on 09/06/2009 5:48:59 AM PDT by steven33442
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson