SLAM !!!! Karl Rove Strikes Back Against "US Attorney Firing Case" Accusers

WSJ/The Lid ^ | 8/19/09 | The Lid

[Shellybenoit]

Good for Karl Rove. The liberal crazies have spent years trying to set him up as the second coming of Darth Vader, Rove's crime, he put together the strategy that got George W. Bush elected twice.

For the past three years, the drive-by media has been accusing Rove of being the brains behind the political firing of eight US Attorneys (who serve at the discretion of the President). The Democrats in congress made this a major Issue accusing the Bush administration of politicizing the Justice Department. OMG, politicizing a political appointment, how could that happen? Ironically those same Democrats suffer from laryngitis when the Obama administration's Justice Dept. made the "non political" decision of dropping the case against the New Black Panther Party who intimidated white voters in Philadelphia. They were also unable to speak out when President Obama fired Inspector General Walpin, because he was closing in on criminal activities committed by a friend of Mrs. Obama.

The House Judiciary has been conducting a witch hunt trying to tie Karl Rove to the firings, today they released Rove's testimony saying that his involvement in the firings was minimal and appropriate.

Now that he has been exonerated by this House Kangaroo Court, Karl Rove is speaking out against his accusers:

[GOP Poet]

bookmark

[madamemayhem]

when the pubbies take back congress next yr. they should immediately start investigating the black panther thing and the inspector general firings.

[muawiyah]

Democrats typically do the crimes they believe others are involved in. Someday we gotta' round 'em up and stuff them in some neat place like the old Point Lookout Federal Prison.

Anyone come up with any connections between Alaska's new senator Mark Begich and the false prosecution of former senator Ted Stevens (who he replaced)?

It's simply not believable that Begich had nothing to do with that.

[Venturer]

The Black Panther members were cut loose with not a peep from the Congress. Is it justice?? Hardly.

Look at the Czars being appointed. Communists, Homosexuals, tax cheats,Racists.

Not a word from the Congress.

We dont have a President, we have a Dictator.

[ripley]

“Karl Rove Strikes Back At Accusers”

Good for you Mr. Rove!!!

[RichInOC]

The Magnificent Bastard...rides again!

[OneWingedShark]

>We dont have a President, we have a Dictator.

Don’t worry, if Justice keeps being thwarted we may have a “bloody revolution” instead.

[MCCRon58]

Unfortunately, I doubt the pubbies will have the testicular fortitude to do anything about it. After all, They did nothing about Billy's boy taking the documents from the national archive.

[McGruff]

Sounds hugh.

[Texas Fossil]

This time it is different.

Under Slick it was “stains on a blue dress”. And a lot of lies.

This time the action should be for “Treason”. And Fraud.

[GoCards]

Thinking about that again just pisses me off. AMAZED

[HighlyOpinionated]

Yes, perhaps my Sept 12 poster should be a call to charge the Impostor with Treason.

FReepmail me a slogan to use. Thanks, HO

[Texas Fossil]

We are approaching a time when such charges will be taken seriously.

[Texas Fossil]

(from WIKI) Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.

There is a great difference in plotting to overthrow a government, and plotting to restore a Constitutional Government. In the first case we have a "Traitor" but in the 2nd case we have a "Patriot"

[Nevermore]

"Perhaps the Times and Post will admit their mistakes.
It would be the responsible thing to do."
I.e., it'll never happen.