See, this is exactly what I was trying to explain in my previous post. Reagan Man fancies himself a psychic, able to read minds; he is very bad at it, but that doesn't stop him from projecting. Every one of his three speculations is dead wrong, and he certainly has no shame about posting ignorant statements about things he knows nothing about.
But, his statements are all about a person he knows nothing about -- not about conservatism, or saving our country, or how to win back control of congress or the white house, or to stop Obama and the democrats from implementing their wrong-headed ideas.
I presume that somewhere in FR, Reagan Man actually does occastionally post conservative views, because why else would he be here. But he never pings me to those topics, only to cases where he is playing a fool. I don't think he is actually a fool, but that's the image he projects. I can't imagine why -- it appears he thinks he is "getting" me somehow, but as I said, I could care less what RM thinks about me, as he obviously doesn't have a clue what he is talking about.
I think people look more intelligent when they stick to topics they know. And it is a rare time when any anonymous poster actually KNOWS anything about how someone they have never met is thinking.
Like I've told you before, you make yourself the issue with off the wall comments that make you look foolish and don't advance conservatism. Also, time and again, you revert to making dumb posts that attack FReepers and refer to them as, Romney haters. Did I make that up? No, of course not. Here are some examples of those anti-FReeper posts from you and properly linked.
... some of these haters... with your hatred of all things Romney. ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
"What is really at work here is that a good number of us at FR no longer have any desire to put up with blind haters and bashers." ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
"In fact, it was the Romney haters who gave us McCain..." ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
"AJ does correctly note the tendency of the loud-mouth conservatives to trash good people for no good reason. You see it here at FR all the time. If someone has an alternative point of view, rather than discussing why that alternative is not conservatives, they simply resort to name-calling and personal attacks." ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
"Sorry, I can’t hope for bad policies to continue so that the economy crashes more just so we get Obama out of office." ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
>>>>>"I’d still rather our economy bounce back, even if it means Obama takes credit." ~~~ CharlesWayneCT
Replies from you that not only bash Freepers, but hope for Obama's success. Lets not forget your endless comments about that liberal TV show on Fox, called "24". Starring that stellar liberal a-hole and rotten actor, Keifer Sutherland.
This thread is very interesting: ROMNEY: Cautionary tale of card check. You should remember it well. You make reference to it in RE:#301 on this very thread:
"I did have one poster, I can’t remember who, actually attack me for not having posted enough individual threads, and for having a majority of my comments on the “24 live” thread.
Your problem is, you don't know how to debate politics. You're a moderate (at best), who likes to post BS to ad nauseam. While you choose to defend liberals like Mitt Romney. You remain obsessive and compulsive, with a desperate personality. You're twisted! LOL
And yet you still post here...
Perhaps he has a hat; and is drawn to place his face in it...