IMHO, a very rational post. However, I suspect there will be much heat and little light on this thread very shortly.
parsy.
Please explain why it is irrational for U.S. citizens who are concerned that the foundation of U.S. law, the Constitution, is being violated? Anyone who has taken the oath required of military members or similar should be extremely concerned. You know, that oath that goes:
“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”
If the person filling the role of the president is doing so fraudulently, per the Constitution, are you relieved of your obligation? If you have doubts, aren’t you obligated to ensure the person giving orders as president can lawfully do so?
Is it rational to lie to yourself?
While the Left has now successfully labeled all that question “crazy”, including pressuring some from our side to agree, I remind you that this same Left element, the ones that promoted such “sane” ideas as, “Bush lied, people died”, or “we were torturing”, or “Bush hates black people”, or even “Governor Sarah Palin wasn't really pregnant”, are now in control of our Government.
Yet, we are now the “crazy” ones for asking this President to adhere to his own policy of transparency.
If this label achieves it final objective, look for this same strategy to be implemented upon those who criticize Obamacare, the Stimulus, Cap and Trade, or any other Obama agenda items.