“Maybe you think that you’re making a “difference” of some sort here.”
H*ll, I’m trying! I don’t dump on every BC thread. I ignore most of them. And again, I am very open minded about the issue. Show me something substantial, and I’ll put on my tin-foil lined floppy eared hat and join right in with you.
Ya’ll said his sister had a fake Hawaiian BC, so I went looking for it on the web. That would have proved interesting and relevant. Couldn’t find it. Nobody seems to have it.
I looked at the BC on line and even one where the site was folding it so you could see the raised seal.
I assure you I am Zen enough that I have no ego in this. If I am wrong, I want to know it. I just ain’t seen anything yet except:
questions and suspicions about the COLB-—and an old woman in Kenya (whom I am assuming exists and said what she was supposed to have said.)
parsy.
Parsy, I suggest that you simply read through a lot of these bc threads without commenting for a while, if you want to gain a real understanding of why this is such an issue for most of us.
Just follow the commentary, and digest the logic, the reasoning, and the arguments for compelling Obama to release this most basic information. The answers you seek are there, in well-reasoned arguments, and also in facts.
Trust me, it's not about sour grapes. It's not the heavy breathings of a lunatic fringe. It's not even about the well-grounded fears of Obama's unquestionable Marxist leanings that are at the center of this.
It's about our adherence to one of the most basic Constitutional proscriptions and concepts. All we're asking Obama to do is to put our minds at ease. He has the power to do this, yet he will not. What sort of President does such a thing to his people? It's unconscionable.
Go back to Watergate. If you understood the public's need to know about that issue, then you can understand our need to know about this one. And, this issue has the potential to be of far greater significance than anything Richard Nixon was guilty of.