I wasn’t arguing the move to digital, I was only arguing that something, indeed, was lost if the paper original was destroyed.
The age of the paper the original was printed on for example.
Well, I was trying to point out that “integrity” is determined by different methodologies in a different medium. And that means when you say that a certain “methodology” is lost (in the forensics for “paper”), it’s because it does not apply in the medium of “digital”. The point of the matter is that it’s not “integrity” that is lost, but rather a “methodology of forensics” that is lost, as it *only applies* to “paper” — and it does not apply to “digital”. It has a different methodology and forensics for determination of “integrity”...