Well, I was trying to point out that “integrity” is determined by different methodologies in a different medium. And that means when you say that a certain “methodology” is lost (in the forensics for “paper”), it’s because it does not apply in the medium of “digital”. The point of the matter is that it’s not “integrity” that is lost, but rather a “methodology of forensics” that is lost, as it *only applies* to “paper” — and it does not apply to “digital”. It has a different methodology and forensics for determination of “integrity”...
Correct, but my overall point is outside of the fact that something new and different is gained at the same time. Only that something was lost.—you call it a “methodology of forensics” call it integrity.