Hi ReneeLynn;
No, I clearly said, and you’d noticed had you read clearly, that I’m INCLINED TO BELIEVE the woman. I’m admitting off the bat that I’m biased against Roethlisberger. Had you read further, you’d noticed that I later said that my personal dislike didn’t matter, and the case should be decided on the facts.
Similarly, people who do like Mr. Roethlisberger should realize that their liking shouldn’t matter either. The cheering posts of several posters seem to forget that basic fact.
P.S. Yes I called him an—let’s rephrase—”human natural waste disposal device”. I chose clarity over manners—in retrospect I shouldn’t have done that, because it tends to be seen as a provocation to begin a flame war. Apologies to my fellow posters.
I get really sick of people who can’t backup what they’ve posted who then turn around and accuse me of not reading their post.
So, you have no basis for believing Ben to be guilty. As in innocent till proven guilty. Or for thinking he’s an a*****e. None. Ah. Well, thanks for sharing?