Posted on 07/08/2009 6:48:36 AM PDT by Islaminaction
While most Western countries would just sit and watch as Muslim rioters destroyed more and more of the country (video), China has take a different approach.
(Excerpt) Read more at islaminaction08.blogspot.com ...
“They were caught in a mass of surrendering trainees in Taliban and al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan....”
Thanks for proving my point.
Right, they would not want an Islamic state anywhere else, they are just innocent Islamists who happen to blow up buses and terrorize non-Muslims. Got it.
They were no threat, that is why Bush held them as long as possible. Got it.
Let's say the US is overrun by China at some point in the future and the Chinese have liquidated the trained personnel along with their entire families, as is the several thousand year Chinese custom. The only people who will help train an American resistance movement are Pan Slavic Russian Fascists who will train you only if you pledge allegiance to the cause of Pan Slavic world domination. Would you pledge allegiance to that movement to get the training and equipment you need? I suspect many would, because the alternative would be extinction. This is the kind of choice the Uighurs have had to make. Everyone supports them verbally. (Bush even met with the leader of their cause). But only al Qaeda and the Taliban have provided the training and weaponry that might be useful against their Chinese oppressors.
Save all the scenarios for someone else.
The were born into China, they do not get their Islamic state.
The are just trouble making Muslims like everywhere else.
Bush is an idiot when it comes to Islam. With his non-stop religion of peace nonsense. Even going so far to say that Saudi Arabia is the “ideal Islamic state”. Yea what a shining example for the world.
Thanks for once again proving that they are terrorists connected to the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
His subordinates were wrong. Just as they were wrong about a nuke in Iraq. The CIA was confident that Uncle Sam would find bomb parts and Bush went to war on that basis. The nation was prepared to go to war with Iraq* only if nuke parts were found, and these parts were never found. Getting trained by al Qaeda and the Taliban is no more evidence of terrorist inclinations any more than Saudi military people getting trained by Americans is evidence of their hankering for American constitutional government. The CIA is wrong *all the time*. They did not know of the Indian bomb up until the Indians tested it. They saw an Iraqi bomb where one did not exist. They never saw 9/11 coming.
* I personally think Iraq was necessary in order to impress upon Muslims and Muslim leaders everywhere that plausible deniability is not going to save them from retribution and the devastation of a bloody civil war.
That's like saying the al Qaeda terrorists who carried out 9/11 were Americanized infidels sponsored by the CIA because they received flight training from American flight instructors.
More nonsense. They are Muslims connected to Islamic terrorists groups.
You believe what you want, you are not going to change my mind.
Take care.
Bet they’ll dip the bullets in bacon fat before firing them.
“Getting trained by al Qaeda and the Taliban is no more evidence of terrorist inclinations....”
LOL! I guess them blowing up buses are not terrorist inclinations or the truck bomb that killed over a dozen security members.
Thanks but lets end this pointless conversation.
Have a good day!
You're confusing two different phenomena. Attacking buses is terrorist activity. Killing government personnel is just guerrilla activity. But here's the thing. Al Qaeda had no real claim against Uncle Sam for attacking us on 9/11. Uncle Sam has not annexed a single square inch of Muslim land. The Uighurs have a genuine claim against the Chinese - they were overrun by the Chicoms in 1946, at a time when Uncle Sam was giving the Philippines its independence. Are some hotheads going to go beyond what we would consider American moral bounds? Absolutely. But prior to Israel's independence, a future prime minister, Menachem Begin, blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, killing dozens of hotel workers. Does this incident mean that Israel has no right to exist?
The land has been going back and forth, it is now China.
Uigurs blew up buses and committed other terrorist activities. They deserve nothing and thankfully they will get nothing.
Seriously, I am done going in circles with you. I stand against them.
Not really. The Uighurs have lived there for thousands of years. The Chinese have conquered them and been booted out repeatedly. But it is Uighur land, just as Eretz Israel is Jewish land.
Yep! If you care for your and/or your family’s wellbeing and safety, you will have to fefend them yourself. The Government is damn sure not going to do it.
Ummm....it is China and it has gone back and forth. The Uigurs are Islamic terrorists now and the beauty of it all is that you can type till your fingers bleed and they will never get their Islamic state. Now they will pay the price. Sorry you and them lose.
Some photos of the victims in the riot
WARN: GRAPHIC PHOTOS
http://bbs.am765.com/detail.jsp?id=890683&agMode=1
Unbelievable.
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.