Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The False Accuser Speaks (Duke Fantasy Rape Victim Crystal Mangum)
Durham in Wonderland ^ | 04/22/09 | KC Johnson

Posted on 04/22/2009 8:22:21 PM PDT by freespirited

 

At the Liestoppers forum, Walt-in-Durham has a detailed rundown of Crystal Mangum’s appearance tonight at UNC. As I have noted previously, it is mindboggling that an academic institution would invite someone who the state AG had, with copious evidence, deemed a false accuser and not allow her to be questioned on the myriad contradictions in her story. It is all the more mindboggling that the only reason for this refusal to allow questions was to prevent the false accuser from saying something that could open her to a lawsuit.

I should note, in addition, that Mangum’s p.r. representative had similarly informed me of the media difficulties that the false accuser had in promoting her book. As I told him at the time, it’s my sense that most media organizations will not put on the air someone whose assertions they know to be false, if only to avoid massive legal liability.

Below is Walt’s rundown:

About 80 folks showed up to see and hear Crystal Gail Mangum talk, about being a victim in both the courts and media. The crowd was courteous and respectful, giving Crystal Gail Mangum a polite welcoming applause even though she showed twenty minutes late. The presentation was a bit of a bait and switch as the sponsoring sorority wanted to discuss other cases that similarly involved mass media reporting of blacks, not just Crystal's hoax. Still, she spoke in a question and answer format that was clearly rehearsed with Ed Clark, her publisher.

Clark lead off the show with a six minute video apparently shot in the spring of 2008 to promote Crystal’s memoir. The video claimed she had been raped and was a victim of media bias and sensationalism. In her video montage she showed pictures of Dr. King and a lynching. I suppose she was trying to equate herself with the civil rights struggle. During the video, two of her drivers were quoted as denying that she was a prostitute. One said he only drove her around five times.

Ed Clark wore his shirttail out and generally looked like he was about ready to wash the car. Crystal was wearing a pink ball cap, an Old Navy hoodie and jeans. She looked pleasant enough, though certainly not well dressed.

Ed began the live portion of the show with a short monologue explaining who he was and making the claim that he now handled “crisis public relations for government agencies.” He left without taking questions, so he never answered my question of which government agency he handled PR for. As a matter of fact, I went prepared with 11 pre-drafted questions for Crystal. None of them pertained directly to the lacrosse hoax as the sorority asked. She too left without taking questions, even though she had said she would answer questions.

After the Ed Clark monologue, he introduced Crystal. But, he immediately launched into a vigorous narrative, again rehearsed, about how the CBS show 60 Minutes would not pay for Crystal’s interview and he claimed to have a copy of an email from CBS saying that one of the families had total access to 60 Minutes and they would bury Mike Nifong. He continued on that HBO had been in contact with him about interviewing Crystal and doing a promotion for the book. He then complained that HBO had a line producer call to kill the project. They pushed back the publication date while they hunted for another media outlet for the launch. Then he claimed that the NBC Today Show sent a vice president, and a camera crew to interview Crystal. The NBC crew allegedly followed her around North Carolina Central’s campus, talked to her Pastor, family and friends. She gave them a four hour interview where they could and did ask any questions. Clark never disclosed the questions. According to Clark, the “contract” between NBC and Crystal would have her on the Today Show, Dateline, MSNBC and CNBC all on the day the book launched. Again a “line producer,” not the VP or producer they had met, called to tell them the promotion was off and the book launched without a major network availability. After Clark’s recitation of his difficulties launching the book, Crystal Gail Mangum spoke.

She opened immediately by stating unequivocally that she was raped. She did not name names though. She did mention Duke Lacrosse in the same general time frame, but it seemed like they were being careful not to make too close a linkage between the two. She also claimed that she had never been heard. She claimed that on the night she was “raped” she was not on medications. She claimed that the defense team had her medical records and was taking a whole year’s worth of medications and claimed that she was on them the night of the “rape”. Crystal then described some symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder that she suffered, and closed with a pitch for the book.

Occasionally Ed Clark would prompt Crystal with some questions in what was a well rehearsed presentation. Crystal continued talking about how she felt: dirty, embarrassed, ashamed, not wanting anyone to know, but afraid they all did know she had been raped. She admitted that early in the investigation, she had a lawyer or lawyers advising her, but they were expensive, $150/hour. She also wanted to get psychological treatment, but was afraid to as the defense had access to her medical records. She said she was not sure whom to trust, the Durham Police Department, the District Attorney? She said she felt like she was being made the victim again for something that was not her fault. She said the DPD and the DA let her down.

Then she got to the part of the show where she blamed the media. She said the media, 60 Minutes especially, put on Kim Roberts without “checking their resources.” Ed Clark jumped in to tell how Variety was reporting that HBO had optioned the stories of the various lacrosse books and even some blogs(?!--ed.). He wanted to option Crystal’s story to HBO. They refused to buy and told him they were coming to Durham and she could cooperate with their movie or not, but she wouldn’t be paid. Later though HBO, through a line producer, told Clark that they wouldn’t even show the footage and interviews they did in Durham.

Crystal then talked about an interview with Soledad O’Brien of CNN. She said she gave Ms. O’Brien four hours of unrestricted access and answered all her questions. Again, she let a CNN crew follow her around and tape whatever they wanted. She had only nice things to say about O’Brien and her producer and the CNN crew. But again, a “line producer” called to tell her that CNN would not air the interview.

Finally, Ed Clark claimed that the website Daily Beast wanted to feature Crystal Mangum on their launch. That too fell through after a long interview with the site’s host. In case you were wondering, a “line producer” also called to tell Clark and Mangum that the site was launching with another story.

Clark then said the Crystal had the flu and apologized for Crystal leaving early. He never said why she wouldn’t take questions from the audience. The both left through a side door and the sorority sisters moved on to another case. About half the audience left as soon as Crystal Gail Mangum and Ed Clark slipped out the side door.



TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: crystalgailmangum; crystalmangum; dukelax; ghastlygash; louvreofdna; lyinghoor; mangum; nifong; swampwoman; unc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: maggief; abb
She said the DPD and the DA let her down.

The DA was never on her side--it was all about winning an election.
As for the DPD----Ask Sgt Shelton (A great American and Cop) how DPD let her down.

21 posted on 04/23/2009 5:51:54 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maggief

BTW—we all know it was not her story her clients were buying. :-)


22 posted on 04/23/2009 6:06:16 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights; abb

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=32542246&postID=1809827830821029668&isPopup=true

DIW Comment:

My recall was along the lines of Walt’s reporting. A lot of people (perhaps including Walt) disappeared after CGM spoke and Clark came back later to take some questions so my narrative includes that part.

The presentation began with a video of Duke lacrosse case images (Duke Chapel, lacrosse stick, Joe Cheshire, Nifong) juxtaposed with iconic images from the Civil Rights struggle (MLK, fire hoses being turned on African-Americans, Chaney, Schwerner, and Goodman).

This was followed by video of CGM at what was described as her first public appearance. In this appearance, she states that she does not want publicity. The video also included pieces of an interview with her drivers. This video was difficult for me to follow due to poor sound quality.

CGM started by complaining that the lacrosse players’ defense attorneys had learned of all the medications she had taken in the year prior to March, 2006 and had suggested that she had been on most/all of these medications the night of the lacrosse party. She then discussed how she had suffered PTSD and had graduated from NCCU with a 3.7 GPA. She reflected that “Life has changed so much” and “every day is a struggle.”

After the video, CGM and Ed Clark began speaking live. Clark recounted how he had first heard the story about the Duke incident on CNN while at Midway Airport in Chicago. He said hearing the story “made me want to come home.” He then discussed his interest in high profile legal cases and how an attorney friend told him that he (the attorney friend) could arrange a conversation with the accuser (CGM). He recalled that he “knew it would be an important moment in North Carolina.”

CGM then discussed how, “when you are raped, you do not want everyone to know. My picture and name were publicized. . . . [I felt like] the whole world was against me.” She stated that, at that time, she felt she could not trust anyone. She did not want to use some counseling resources because “my medical records were being policed.” He said the DPD let her down as did everyone she came in contact with. As Walt pointed out, she never said who raped her.

The discussion then turned to how Clark and CGM felt that the media had stiff armed them. Clark talked of a “well-oiled machine” that could get the lacrosse players on 60 Minutes and keep CGM off. CGM complained that 60 Minutes did not check its sources. Interestingly, she complained that 60 Minutes never contacted her about Kim Roberts’ claim that CGM wanted Roberts to “put marks on her.” However, she did not use this opportunity to say that the Roberts claim about “putting marks on her” was a lie. She merely complained that the show did not ask her about Roberts’ statement.

Clark then discussed how HBO acquired rights to the lacrosse story and how various people would be compensated but that he was not offered anything.

I also got the impression that Clark claimed 60 Minutes sent a memo to the lacrosse families suggesting the show would “put a bullet in Nifong’s head and discredit Crystal.”

CGM recounted how CNN spent four hours interviewing her after the AG report was released. She felt that CNN was “disappointed” she was not “an addict on welfare.” They then claimed that CNN killed the interview (conducted by Soledad O’Brien) and then would not take their calls.

Clark complained that the possible date for airing the CNN interview coincided with the intended release date of the Magnum book (May 15, 2008). He also pointed out that he got the message that the interview would not be broadcast from a lower level CNN producer.

Clark then discussed how an NBC VP called about a possible segment on Dateline which would also give the book exposure on the Today Show, MSNBC, and CNBC. After filming, they learned from a “line producer” that NBC would not run the interview because they did not find CGM to be credible.

Clark also complained about a new website created by Tina Brown. According to Clark, Brown would feature the CGM book on the website’s first day and that two million “hits” were anticipated. As with CNN and NBC, the Brown site (“Daily Beast”) got cold feet and pulled out.

Clark then said that CGM had the flu this week and he had promised her that she would not have to stay at the event too long. Before heading to a nearby side door that directly exited the building, CGM talked about the importance of speaking out, we are all God’s children, etc.

After CGM left, student leaders presented five cases of prosecutorial misconduct in North Carolina. The cases included Darryl Hunt whose conviction was overturned when he was exonerated by DNA evidence. Another case was Ronnie Long, who claimed that he was in jail because the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence and an inaccurate description from his putative victim.

After these cases, Clark took a handful of questions, some of which were submitted and screened and some which came directly from the audience.

It was hard to follow the questions, but it was interesting to follow Clark’s comments.

One interesting answer (I did not hear the question) was, “What if she is lying? What of it?

He said that Nifong’s biggest mistake was that he “went against the wrong people.”

He said that there was a pattern to the disappearing interviews because it was about “crushing anyone who would implicate their children. These people (lacrosse families) have dinner with Sumner Redstone and Jack Welch.”

“Whether CGM is credible or not, a jury must decide.”

He said that executive producers keep calling him to do stories, but the higher level executives kill the stories. According to Clark, other media projects that were stillborn included Inside Edition, Geraldo Rivera on Fox, and HBO sports.

When asked if having the rug pulled out from him was legally actionable, he indicated that he had “emails from people who guaranteed me things.” But, he also indicated that he would not pursue legal action.

He claimed to ask AG Cooper if “all the records will be released” and suggested that there were things that had not yet come to light about the case.

This is the best recounting I can offer at this time. Tomorrow, I will provide my analysis and impressions.

Good Night Wonderlanders

4/22/09 11:32 PM


23 posted on 04/23/2009 6:08:33 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maggief

When NBC and CNN refuse to air her interviews it tells me her “book” isn’t going to sell very well. Maybe Al Sharpton will buy one and ask for an autograph, but he will be the only one.

I’m afeered that the natural audience for her book doesn’t read.

Jerry springer still on TV?


24 posted on 04/23/2009 8:58:44 AM PDT by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Thanks, maggief. You have been able to keep watch and keep everyone alerted when the rest of us would never have heard about this in other parts of the country.

It's hard to imagine that she is trying to exploit this, but how I can be surprised after the depths to which she sank before. I think it speaks volumes when Jackson Farakhan and Sharpton have given her wide birth and don't even mouth off about the “injustice” done from time to time.

While my heart still breaks for the families and young men, they will have the grateful appreciation of those of us without the means to take such an aggressive course of action for shedding light on this. I truly believe it put the brakes on DAs with agendas as opposed to DAs who serve justice. Their steadfast course turned over a big rock, and I believe the nation saw what disgusting creatures live under it.

25 posted on 04/23/2009 10:45:18 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Criminal went to UNC for hero treatment, not Duke.


26 posted on 07/31/2009 11:21:17 AM PDT by Guilty by Association (Don't wander in here without first acquiring a clue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson