Posted on 03/23/2009 1:31:58 PM PDT by sussex
Is this nut still around. What a nitwit.
That's kinda the difference between a body that attracts and one that repulses.
LOL. Sure. Susan Ostrich has the best interests of the Republican Party at heart.
Susan Estrich makes Helen Thomas look prettier than Miss America by Comparison, either before or after Age Adjustment Considerations! MY GOSH! A NEW DEFINITION OF UUGGLLYY!!and it’s all Internal, forget the external Junk!
Susan Estrich is exactly right! The Republicans are in disarray.
However, I’m still a little nauseous after watching Susan Estrich slobber all over Bibi Netanyahu a coupld years back - it was a sickening sight and even Bibi was turned off. It made me realize that Susan Estrich loves Israel but hates America!
Of course, nothing new there. Liberals hating America.
I remember how proud I was of Gingrich when he took Clinton to the woodshed again and again, and Clinton was forced to accept Gingrich’s policies, enact them, and then try to take credit for them, which he does to this day.
I remember the so-called “government shutdowns” when Gingrich demonstrated to anyone paying attention how little of the government we actually needed to get along.
I also remember the day Gingrich suddenly went all soft and cuddly toward Clinton, and I said out loud, Clinton’s got something on him.
And he evidently did. I would like to see Gingrich claw his way back, but losing him right at the height of the battle against Clinton was tragic. We need another Gingrich, meaning a guy with a clear vision where we need to go, who absolutely loves to do battle. The old Gingrich will probably not be that guy. He has a role to play as our philosopher, but his warrior days are done.
I'd put Paul Ryan up against those two goofs (Geithner and Summers) any day of the week.
Why is Susan Estrich so concerned about the Governor of Alaska? Or the Governor of Louisiana? These people have their own jobs to do.
When one party controls the Presidency and both houses of Congress, it is only natural that the opposition will not have a defined leader until a the next Presidential primary season is well underway. We’ll pick our leader in 2012.
Frankly, if we did have a leader, he would just be demonized 24/7 by the Round-Heeled Media, anyway. So it is probably just as well that we don’t. If that means that commentators, such as Susan Estrich, will have to make arguments on the merits rather than just ad-hominem attacks on our “leader”, I can live with that.
I agree with Reagan and Gingrich, but how can anyone talk about either President Bush having a program or a single set of talking points? George W. Bush had one forced upon him on 9/11, but even that was only for foreign policy and wasn't quite as clear as it should be becuase of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
We do need a focused, quick to state policy. It can be more detailed underneath, but we need a grabber like "Defeat the Soviet Union and reduce taxes" from Reagan or Gingrich's Contract with America. We don't have that yet, but after another month or two of Obama it might be "Anyone but Obama".
I don’t know who this Estrich guy is, but he sure is one weird-looking dude.
Thats all I'll say about that.
First of all, I think Sarah Palin’s body has greater chance of passing the gravity test than does the body of Susan Estrich.
That being said, the quote posted above from Susan Estrich is pretty much the way I feel.
That voice, however, will make you want to stick a knitting needle in your ears.
I think Paul Ryan voted for the 90% tax.....IDIOT.
Even a Bozo like Estrich stumbles on the truth now and again.
Yes, old whores end up giving it away for nothing - or close to it in exchange for being listened to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.