There isn’t enough information in the article.
Is he talking about someone getting injured in the field and then having to pay for the treatment? If it is, then why is the Veteran’s Administration quoted?
If it’s old injuries in veterans... then why the hyperbole of stating that the troops will have to pay for their own medical care?
Get us the EEI’s (who, what, when, where, why, and how), and we can talk. But this obfuscation is on par with Obama himself.
You don’t get the Obama Admn. They deal in obfuscation. That said, “services related injuries” sounds pretty clear to me.