I watched the short video and I didnt see Mike Steele make an attack on Limbaugh.
He agreed that Rush’s statement were incendiary. They were incendiary and thats what we need. We need enough incendiary statements to set the whole Conservative world on fire. We are drowning in Liberalism, We ar getting bills shoved down our throats as fast as Pelosi and Reid can think them up.
He argued with the creep aboput who is in charge of the Republican party, and stated he was in charge. He was correct. Now he needs to act like he is in charge and start using some incendiary statements of his own. Republicans stood by and took all the cow patties that the Democrats tossed at them for 8 year cringing in their offices like frightened children. Its time they stood up and tossed incendiaries enough to set the political world on fire.
Mike could have handled this a bit better maybe, but I wont concemn him yet.
That's true, but I disagree with his use of the word incendiary in referring to Rush's speech. The word has a negative connotation - of stirring up to destruction and mob action - but Rush's speech was actually quite inspiring, and while it did try to encourage people to action, I didn't think the action in question was marching with pitchforks on the White House or its current occupant.
Well said. I listened to the video twice and what I heard was Steele making a general statement, not just referring to the CPAC speech, that Limbaugh could be ugly and incendiary. I found him supportive of Limbaugh and his party.
The colossal racial divisiveness unspoken of, the tyranny of low expectations:
Section Eight Set Asides.
http://www.adversity.net/fed_stats/1_sect_8a.htm