Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2
I agree. It is overstated, but the task is not that hard, and the results would be very bad.

All you need is a nuke, and a delivery mechanism to loft the nuke to a certain height.

Iran is close to having a nuke.
Iran just launched a satellite.
The EMP blast should occur at an altitude of 300 miles -- satellites are much higher, so this altitude is very achievable for Iran.

The only 2 questions are:
Can the Iranian rocket lift a nuke (I think their satellite was quite small).
and
Would Iran mind the retaliatory strike from our subs (which would not be affected by the EMP)?

23 posted on 02/13/2009 7:45:46 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Obama must be the Antichrist. No one else would work so hard to destroy the US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy
The mullahs want nukes as a insurance against regime change and deterrance of attacks (ala North Korea). They are power hungry and bent on cementing their domestic rule and regional influence. This is dangerous and evil enough. But they are not nearly as suicidal as their rethoric suggests.

Al-Qaeda of course is a different matter.

41 posted on 02/13/2009 7:50:32 AM PST by SolidWood ("NO on the stimulus package" Governor Palin said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Well put. A recognized “terrorist state” has all the pieces for a worst case tinfoil hat hysterical nutcase scenario; they just have to put it together.


81 posted on 02/13/2009 8:14:37 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson