There is nothing wrong with the scientific method in and of itself.
The problem is with the presuppositions that the scientists make and incorporate into interpreting the data that the scientific method provides.
The philosophies that the scientists adhere to color their analysis and make it impossible to be entirely objective.
Precisely how does one test for God and how does one factor in his influence into equations and formula?
What presuppositions do you submit scientists make, and what presuppostions do you submit they should be replaced with?
The philosophies that the scientists adhere to color their analysis and make it impossible to be entirely objective.
Exactly what philosophies are those, and what exactly what philosophies should they be required to assume in order to insure that they are perfectly objective?