Precisely how does one test for God and how does one factor in his influence into equations and formula?
And what does that have to do with the comments in the post you are responding to?
[[Precisely how does one test for God]]
IF you’ve been following any of these type threads, then you should know the answer to that- You test for fingerprints- unmistakable evidences- and hwen you accumulate enough of them to show that it is something that is beyond the capabilities of Nature and biology, and hwen you present enough reasonable evidneces that show the actual fingerprints present- and yes, they are present, then you have a strong enough case- just as you woukld in ANY forensic investigation
[[and how does one factor in his influence into equations and formula?]]
Who says you have to? When hte evidnec e becomes overwhelming, the case is made regardless of equations and formula. When the evidence mounts showing that 1000 clay pots couldn’t have created themselves, and that an intelligence was needed- the case is made- period. One need NOT identify the intelligence- all one has to do is show that an intelligence was needed to cause the complexities we see. Secularists are attempting to make the case that nature is the ‘intelligence’ behind the causations, but their little god just isn’t big enough I’nm afraid! It fails on so many fronts it isn’t even funny.