You're playing with words here. A real theologian could give us the correct terms. Christian churches have always taught that nature is God's creation and can be investigated & understood by mankind. There is no ancient dichotomy between them, at least that I know of.
****You’re playing with words here. A real theologian could give us the correct terms. Christian churches have always taught that nature is God’s creation and can be investigated & understood by mankind. There is no ancient dichotomy between them, at least that I know of.****
Jesus Christ verified the Creation Account as historically accurate (Mark 10:6), He also verified the creation of Adam and Eve (Matthew 19:4-5).
Any Church that teaches “theistic evolution” or anything else that disagrees with those two passages is calling Jesus Christ a liar and should be considered as aberrant theologies within the “Christian” umbrella.
They are placing the worldview (again I say it is a worldview and not proveable by the scientific method) of the scientific community and placing it above the very words of the Son of God.
I’d call that aberrant.