[CottShop]

[[And on what grounds do Creationists claim that Intelligent Design is a “science”?]]

On the scientific grounds- period- Pure ID is STRICTLY scientific

[[Well, they quote the Bible, don’t they?]]

Who does?

[[Are you serious? I thought the subject here was what should be taught in science classes — evolution or Creationism / Intelligent Design.]]

It is the subjest- Again- did Sister K state that religion should be taught? I sure didn’t see where she did- like it or not, both scientific disciplines, Creationism and ID are scientific methods of investigation-

[SisterK]

Your memory is correct. I did not advocate teaching Creation in public school. My complaint is that evolution is presented as gospel, hard science, and with no options. It shuts the brain down. Bias liberal hooeey.

[NicknamedBob]

"... like it or not, both scientific disciplines, Creationism and ID are scientific methods of investigation- ..."

It's refreshing to note that you leave room in your world view to be so generously inclusive.

[BroJoeK]

BroJoeK: "[[And on what grounds do Creationists claim that Intelligent Design is a “science”?]]

CottShop: "On the scientific grounds- period- Pure ID is STRICTLY scientific."

You're joking and mocking us, aren't you?

There is NOTHING scientific about "intelligent design." All you did was take your Bible-based "Creationism" file and renamed it "Intelligent Design." There's nothing more there.

No serious scientific work, no peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals, no actual debate amongst recognized scientists -- nothing.

I'll say again, I agree philosophically, theologically and religiously that God created the heavens, earth and its creatures. But that is not science, and science doesn't care what you or I think about it.