Posted on 01/04/2009 5:39:47 AM PST by PurpleMountains
All across the country, archeologists, paleontologists and biologists are taking part in what is perhaps the greatest example of political correctness in history – their adherence to Darwinism and their attempts to ostracize any scientist who does not agree with them. In doing so, they are not only ignoring the vast buildup of recent scientific discoveries that seriously undermines the basics of Darwinism, but they are also participating, due to politically correctness, in a belief system that indirectly resulted in the deaths of millions of people – those slaughtered by the Stalins, the Hitlers, the Maos, the Pol Pots and others who took their cue from Darwinism’s tenets.
(Excerpt) Read more at forthegrandchildren.blogspot.com ...
meta
Please, do not let me hinder you, post on.
I wait breathlessly for your next pearl.
Your lack of attention to what you are spouting, spittle-flecked or not, is indicative that you neither care about your presentation or those to whom it is presented, nor understand why it affects your credibility.
For the most part, I don’t have a problem with your orthographical extravagance. What bothers me most is that you don’t make a lot of sense. At least part of that is because you don’t make the effort.
[[I am trying to keep rationality a part of these discussions, ]]
[[ which otherwise are increasingly dominated by fundamentalism, superstition and other forms of irrationality.]]
Do you beleive hte crap that flows fro myou? Seriously? you are oen of htem ost spiteful nasty commentors here when it coems to petty taunts agaisnt those you dissagree with.
Enough with the ‘oh poor me’ martyre posts eh? Poor old coyote- just ‘tryign to teach’ whgile the big mean old Creationists keep responding to him wit nothign but insults- poor old Coyoteman, who would never ever insult htose he’s arguing against- oh heck no!
Give me a break!
[[And I am used to teaching. Judging from the mail I receive there are many here who benefit from my posts.]]
mmmm hmmmm- you’r fans from DC that also have their eyes and ears firmly clamped shut-
----->Just how do you know that he is not making an effort??<-------
Hmmmm?
[[Your lack of attention to what you are spouting, spittle-flecked or not, is indicative that you neither care about your presentation or those to whom it is presented, nor understand why it affects your credibility.]]
your lack of understanding that truth stands on it’s own merrits and doesn’t need propping up is what is affectign your credibility- What I psot is truth- mispelled words and all, and it is the truth that stands the test of time DBob-
[[What bothers me most is that you don’t make a lot of sense.]]
What didn’t make sense to you Bob? The part where Ergaster isn’t a valid transition? What don’;t you understand about that? Perhaps I can help you understand it better- although it’s pretty understandable if you ask me. This isn’t some opinion of mine- it’s established consensus even amoung your own evo scientists.
I’m going to guess that you’re what? 12’ish? And as such, apparently incapable of refuting the issue being discussed- so I’ll cut you some slack- after all, it’s apparent that the facts are too icky for you & your hero worship of the ‘rationalization’ of someone who posts somethign silly like Ergaster being a transitional, has blinded you and rendered you incapable apparently, of presentign anythign worthwhile responding to. Now run along-
Oh, that would be just the saddest thing, wouldn't it?
Do you suppose he is laboring under an early version of Free Republic software that did not have spell-checking?
Look everyone- They got hteir butts handed to em when it was expsoed that Ergaster isn’t a transitional, and now,m, per usual, they are all attackign the character of the one who presented that fact- Yawn! Seen this act a 1000 times kids- nothign new under the sun- soemthign coems along that you don’t like? Derail the thread with childish taunts- Well done Bob, hot, Dev. You do your cause wonders.
By the way, further congratulations appear to be in order not only for your ten-year anniversary as a poster here, but for your being one of the most precocious individuals ever to grace the planet.
Woo-Hoo!
< Bowing in front of you with hat in hand, > "Oh please, throw me another bone."
You make an excellent argument for why people need to consider that the earth may not in fact be flat.
But
You knew that,
right?
At any rate, you may (if you wish) have the last word, as I have to get some sleep, so that tomorrow I can go forth, face the ravenous hordes, and partake of the fruits of (gasp) evolution.
That is with a capital "E" if you look real close.)
:-))
no you can have hte last word
[[You make an excellent argument for why people need to consider that the earth may not in fact be flat.]]
Only idiots that did NOT read God’s word, but pretended they were His spoekespeople thought hte earth was flat- But htose hwo WERE God’s TRUE people and read His word knew it was indeed not flat- not sure why you bring up the urban myth as your parting insult- oh yeah, that’s right- you got nothign better to present but urban myths, religious beleifs abotu Darwinism, and assumptions about everything inbetween molecules and man
How we doing on that ‘ergaster is a transitional pecies’ issue? Got that one rebuttled yet? Didbn’t htink so. but do please keep posting nothing insults- it again really bolsters your case- meanwhile, we’ll just keep posting hte facts, the evidnece and the truth that exposes TOE for hte scam and snow job it really is
No true Scotsman.....
What exactly does substance mean?
I gave you a plain answer, from Genesis (In the beginning) to the birth of Christ we are given the the bloodline to Christ. Christ was represented in Genesis as was that other would be god of the knowledge of good and evil.
Evolutionary biology is about randomness of reactions based upon man modeled claims that come from their fundamentalists claim of a hot steamy primordial pond. There is NO Christ in their models.
Now, we are done.
Is that true?
Evolution is a fact
Is that the truth?
Science does not deal in proof.
Is that true?
No theory in science has been, or can be, proved.
Is anything you say about evolution true?
Wrong...the connection between heroin and milk is nothing like the godless connection between evolution and the NEA.
Right here.
Are you a Christian?
You really have to use discernment with peer review and with stuff published by certain groups of scientists. For example, there was tons of peer-reviewd stuff published by Eugenists. It was peer reviewd by other eugenists. The public of course thought that what they were hearing was real science. Alfred Ploetz and other race hygienists started up the Archiv fur Rassen und Gesellschaftsbiologie with the view to giving a respectable forum for their views. Big names like Haeckel and Weismann lent their support. The AAAS published lots of science papers by eugenists, e.g., Conklin etc. That gave them credibility. Not surprisingly because the AAAS was run by eugenists. The Monist journal was a raving atheist evolutionary rag which solicited science papers from big names. The big names lent the journal credibility. Paul Carus, the editor, and his group would inject crazy articles about "Pagan Jesus" and so on. But since that tripe appeared in journals alongside Boltzmann and Poincare, people thought this was the latest in peer-reviewed science. I mean, one simply has to use one's brain when reading science papers, and not just say that, because it's in some journal, it must be the freshest waters of truth or whatnot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.