Posted on 01/02/2009 6:35:05 PM PST by usar91B
I was so p.o’d last night. The PlainsRadio host said the divorce papers he was about to post say that the Obama’s had a son, “born in Kenya.”
Then he posts the divorce agreement, and it only says they had a son. Why does this guy kill his own credibility over and over again? How many more times does he have to cry wolf and have me come in for the kill? Now he says his private investigator has located a ‘port of entry’ birth certificate on BHO.
I was so p.o’d last night. The PlainsRadio host said the divorce papers he was about to post say that the Obama’s had a son, “born in Kenya.”
_______________________
Ah yes!!! And don’t forget his dishonesty in asking for money from his listeners to do further investigative work about Obama’s port of entry. He knew which it was but would not reveal it. Ha!!!!
A listener donated $1300...if that was true at all.
Maybe the slammer is calling today.
P.S.
Another thing that struck me strange was the odd amount of $1300. $1000, 1500...yes. But $1300?
All I can tell you is that I was born at noon and not at midnight. The idiot doctor who was to delivery me was having lunch. The nurse and my mother delivered me.
Maybe that was good seeing he was not a responsible doctor.
A child can only be the issue of one marriage. Since Obama II is listed as the issue of the Dunham-Obama I marriage, he cannot be the issue of the Dunham-Soetoro marriage unless he was legally adopted into the second marriage. My reading of the Dunham-Soetoro divorce is that he is a child over 18 issue of the marriage indicating adoption into the Dunham-Soetoro marriage. Not sure, but I thought that Obama I already had child(ren) in Kenya with another woman. If so, note that those child(ren) are not listed on the Dunham-Obama I divorce because they were not issue of that marriage and they were not adopted into the marriage.
Anyone here have dealings with blended families and divorces? How were the children listed?
What have we got to lose at this point, Brutus? I’ll give it a chance until there’s nothing left. At least they’re trying. No Republicans are doing anything about this.
BESURETODRINKYOUROVALTINE
Ovaltine? A crummy commercial? Son of a b****!
Brutus, I heard his broadcast and I saw the decree. There are 4 pages missing, and I think deliberately. Also, he claims that he’s been made aware of a Kenyan BC that exists in a US port of entry, location unknown, and we’ll know more on Monday.
This is Eclair’s fault. If Hale is lying, he will suffer the consequences. Right now, it’s all we have to go on. Give him a chance until all is exhausted. That’s all I’m saying.
Unless you’ve sent him money, you’ve nothing to complain about but your time. No one’s forcing you to listen.
Brutus, SCOTUS has turned down everything. They won’t touch this. If Hale has nothing, it won’t matter, because there’s no case.
I see your point, you’re basing it on the assumption that one of the filings have a chance. Maybe you’re right. I didn’t look at it quite that way. Right now, I’ve given up on Berg-Wrotnowski-Donofrio-Keyes.
Worldnetdaily listed a case a few days ago that looks like it has some legs. There’s not much else we can do. Hale’s not gonna stop.
I think that you need to revisit your strategy, and I’ll give you my reasons why.
1st of all, most of Eclair’s followers are members of the O-cult. As Rush stated, these idiots won’t listen to us. We right wingers don’t cult our leaders.
As for degrading public O-pinion, it’s a waste of time, until and unless the GOP gets back to conservative fundamentals. We need to get true conservatives elected. We need to give voters REAL choices, not McLame-Huckaschmuck-Ron Paul choices. Real conservatives.
In 2004, 121.1 million voted. This election, 130+ million were expected. Only 121.8 million voted! What happened to the other 9 million? In part, 4.1 million religious conservatives that didn’t vote said that McLame didn’t speak out enough on socially conservative positions. In Ohio, Eclair got 40,000 LESS votes than Kerry. Why didn’t McLame win Ohio then? Because McLame collected 350,000 LESS votes than Bush did!
So you see, don’t waste your efforts on reducing Eclair’s cult status. Instead, let’s focus on giving people solid conservative choices. Schwarzennegar style RINOs need no longer apply.
One more item my friend (by the way, I love to read the fire in your belly!), the court of public O-pinion right now is in the hands of the MSM. It is highly unlikely that confronting them head-on like this will achieve positive results without true conservative alternatives.
Hmmmmmmm, Hmmmm. Resistance. To quote a sci-fi show, “resistance is futile” against a cult. You and I want to achieve the same goal, but use different strategies. I think that we need to infiltrate them, not resist them. They’ve been doing this to us for the last 6 years. It worked. We need to do the same to them! Implode them from inside!
“Palo caga’o?” “Pinga dura?” Amazing. I know one Cuban term that is very applicable to ol’ Stanley Ann: BOLLO LOCO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.