If you don’t want to be associated with nutcases like the reconstructionists and dominionists, be careful that you don’t advocate the same positions.
If you don’t want to be associated with nutcases like the reconstructionists and dominionists, be careful that you don’t advocate the same positions.
***Does that mean it’s fair game to associate you with nutcases like the “hopeful monster” dude? How about Hitler or Stalin?
You see, that's what you don't get. I'm not concerned about you "associating" me with Dominionists any more than I'm concerned you might associate me with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, and that goes for your efforts to "associate" any more than a handful of American Christians with these ideas. You might as well be saying that I'm a ham sandwich because both I and the sandwich contain protein, or saying that I'm a child molester and murderer because John Wayne Gacy and I have both lived in Illinois. Your assertion is such a non-sequitur that the word "non-sequitur" isn't strong enough to describe it!
One of the ludicrous articles you cited as "proof" of the Dominionist threat against America and Science named Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America as a prominent Dominionist. Well then, if you, Coyoteman, support the Second Amendment, you too support the aims of Domininists and are just biding your time until the day you can ban Astronomy! Welcome to the team, sir! We'll let you in even though your position on evolution associates you with Lenin, Stalin and Margaret Sanger. We'll need all the troops we can get if we're going to oppress all those Presbyterians and Methodists on schedule.
Now, let's not forget what you were asked in the post you were replying to with another ludicrous accusation:
Do you believe eliminating religion should be a main goal of working scientists?
That's a simple yes or no question.