Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (application pending)
ping
They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
:::::::::::
So far, the SCOTUS response to this issue has been totally counter to the law of the Constitution. I frankly don’t think the law matters anymore.
No BC, No peace.
Let’s all hope and PRAY!
Excellent letter.
Thanks for posting this, Calpernia.
Ping.
The Supremes need to get off their derelict duffs, and give Americans proof that Obama is a US citizen. The ball is in their court, because Obama has failed to do the right thing, not because others aren’t justified in requesting the truth.
Unnecessary and inflammatory. Ms. Taitz would do well to just stick with the legalities of the matter.
... some of whose members have very questionable moral qualities (to say the least).
Again, unnecessary and inflammatory. Ms. Taitz would do well to just stick with the legalities of the matter.
They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
And, finally, Ms. Taitz all but accuses the Supreme Court of being part of a conspiracy, along with the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers. This is no way to win friends or influence opinion.
I wish her and Alan Keyes nothing but good luck with their efforts. In light of this sort of communication, however, I'm down to pinning my hopes on Broe v. Reed in Washington. That case is laid out clearly and concisely, with none of the weird emotional outbursts and intemperate public statements that seem to have come to characterize so many others, from Berg to Donofrio and now this one.
I now believe that the SCOTUS is worthless and doesn’t intend to do it’s job.