I realize you said you won’t be responding to any challenges, so I’m posting this to the forum to see what others say. I posted your article on the Intrade forum and this was one of the responses. I don’t try to change viewpoints over there, I just hope there’s some zingers that are glaringly obvious to some freepers that I could respond with. Keep in mind this is, Not Mine, It’s SomeOne Else’s Response:
https://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/300/2279.page#36786
I read through most of that article and I’m not convinced. His argument that the certificate is forged is based on three things, amongst others: (my comments in parenthesis)
(1) The layout and graphics of the certificate looks different from several other certificates (which themselves look different from each other)
(2) There are few green pixels around four letters of the certificate = the certificate is forged (so how did the few green pixels get there?)
(3) The position of the (manually-punched) seal is too low
And he makes a big deal about the seal being the wrong date, but doesn’t quite get to the point about that argument.
Not convinced.
C'mon Kevmo. You know better than to post this crap. This guy is talking out of his rump. He never read the entire report, and has no clue about what little he did read.
Obama trolls will never read through my report, because they cringe at the idea that they are wrong.
Nothing more need be said.