As I said, I am not answering any questions because everything that anyone needs to know, and everything that you just asked me, is fully explained in my report.
So, consider the following a one-time only exception to my stance on answering questions.
I stated in my report that (a) more than one "COLB object" was used for the photos, (b) there were different colors, grades, and textures of paper shown in the photos that are not found in real COLBs, and (c) the Seal itself has major reality issues, meaning that the Seal we are seeing in the photos is missing things found in a real Seal.
When you look carefully at the photo you provided, you will see that (d) ALL OF THE ABOVE apply here.
Polarik, I read your investigation and report with much interest and thought I would share with you something else I noticed in the ‘different seal’ imprints on the COLB’s you are using in your investigation.
If you look at the Caduceus in a regular seal imprint, you will notice that the top of the staff is just about in line (slightly to the right) with the “T” of the word ‘DEPARTMENT’ at the top of the seal and the bottom of the staff points almost directly at the word ‘of’ around the bottom of the seal.
On the other hand, the Caduceus staff in the fake seal is aligned differently. The top of the staff is lining up with the letters ‘NT’ of the word “DEPARTMENT” and the bottom lines up with one of the vertical lines of the letter “H” of the word “HAWAII”.
This is in addition to the other anomolies you have already noted between the Caduceus of the two compared seals.
One other aspect I did notice, was that the telltale dot you referred to in the early part of your report, is actually not present in the “3D” photo versions of the COLB. How would they have disposed of that?
Again, well done!! A very detailed report, that I am sure should force Obama to respond. but maybe I am being naive.