Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dascallie

Private conference? That will kill it. Don’t hold your breath.


9 posted on 11/20/2008 4:00:04 AM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smokeyb

A Private Conference is so that Buttock’s lawyers can say -

hey, look, heres the BC, it says he’s born in Hawaii, but it also says “religion: Muslim” or “Father: [not who he claims]”

and this would be too embarassing to bring out in public.

The upshot is, we’ll probably NEVER see it, and every treaty, law, and EO will be suspect as being invalid.


68 posted on 11/20/2008 5:39:23 AM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: smokeyb

Exactly.

I hope that I’m wrong; but I believe that the Supremes won’t want cause that kind of fuss.


78 posted on 11/20/2008 6:08:03 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: smokeyb
The Justices meet in conference either twice weekly or twice monthly to discuss what cases they'll docket for argument - it's SOP.

If four of the nine agree on the merits, a case is scheduled for further briefs and argument.

This is getting legs for real .. now comes the time for the nine to prove their loyalty - Constitution or public opinion.

113 posted on 11/20/2008 7:40:59 AM PST by tomkat ( . . preparing to shrug . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson