Don't hold your breath my FRiend. This has all the smell of the fix being in. There is no legal precedent for this area of Constitutional Law and the Supremes may decided that there should not be any. In fact they may say there is no fowl of the law because he has not been sworn in yet. Odd thing the law. This particular case has an interesting slant and may not give them room to wiggle if they take it. In any case the outcome will be interesting. If they saw the One cannot be President there will be cries of court's stealing the people's will and if they say he can be them the rule of law will seem to be crushed. Fine mess the arrogant puke has gotten us into. The founding father's IMHO never believed anyone would have the stones to run if they were not natural born so they did not make this a very well defined specific requirement.
What are the chances of SCOTUS not doing anything until after the inauguration?
Considering:
~ TheOne* is not a President yet, so he hasn’t done anything wrong. Not his fault some people chose him.
~ Till Jan 19 he can play the PE role. The Constitution speaks only about President not President Elect. Till that date he’s free to play his game.
~ Once he takes the position of President, only then can he be held responsible for misleading The People. Until now, nothing unconstitutional has happened.
Has it been released what his answer was to the original Berg suit?