[Klepto]

Anyone have a SCOTUS link to verify this? Such a thing would be a most unusual move by a justice.

[mnehring]

See 31
Half true but can’t find the disclosure demand.

[kralcmot]

only source i can find is Berg’s website

and that does not post the Souter order...but references it

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

[RummyChick]

I am hoping it is true but it seems highly unusual to require a piece of evidence that is the crux of the case before you even decide whether to hear the case?

I don’t know how these things operate but it doesn’t make sense.

[Patrick1]

Great, President Biden.

Stand up Joe!

[hoosiermama]

Papers are posted on Berg's web sight: www.obamacrimes.com or go to the SCOTUS page it is on their schedule.

My father, who is now retired, says the problem is that there is no precedence and that the lower courts “no standing” is often used by a judge who doesn't want “get involved” to move the case upward.

[Lexinom]

~~~Date~~~ 	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 	Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 	Application (08A391) for an injunction pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 	Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 	Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter. 

Source, from SCOTUS website