Posted on 11/07/2008 6:47:37 PM PST by mnehring
This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.
Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box? Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that disqualifies Obama from the office of the President. What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.
Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.
The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas
If The Supreme Court Decides…?
At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."
Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.
Its like being a vacuum salesman ... you gotta stick your foot in the door first, before you can attempt to make the sale.
I think Berg has done that and, with the NJ case and others in the pipeline, SCOTUS SHOULD relent and hear the cases(s).
Not to get off topic, but on the lighter side of things:
“Leave It To Beaver” actor Tony Dow (Wally) is getting one of his sculptures displayed in the Louvre ... “Gee Wally ...”
There is no constitutional requirement that the Chief Justice swear the new President in. Rev. Wright could preside.
I am not arguing that Electors will go against their party only that there is nothing stopping them from voting any way they want if they are willing to face the consequences.
In fact, I would not be surprised to see the Democrats vote for Kang or Kodos if the party so ordered.
There is nothing in the Constitution to stop that nonsense either. Although I can’t see small states red or blue going for it and reducing attention paid to them.
This is yet another attempt to change the federal republic the Founders set up for a spurious “democracy”. Direct election of Senators was the biggest move away from the Founders to date.
“Civil War here we come if this isn’t resolved.”
History repeating? The more I think about this, the more concerned I become.
OK I get it. I like the way you think.
Well even a blind pig finds an acorn every now and then.
and others in the pipeline
There are others?
Of course, they know that is why they tried to pass that Resolution in the Senate certifying McCain as qualified while sneaking in approval for non-Natural born citizens.
Bookmark. Waiting for some action!
The birth announcement did not list a location of birth. It simply announced the birth of a son to the Obama’s.
The birth announcement did not list a location of birth. It simply announced the birth of a son to the Obama’s.
Good info here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2114292/posts
Well good gravy we could have agreed 200 posts ago. ;-)
Lib/marxists won't be happy until they destroy the Republic and make us a "democracy".
Democracy = mob rule
You do realize that Obama did not use the usual list of DNC Electors by state, his are all his own.
Nope. I didn’t know that. Why am I not surprised?
How did he do that or how did it happen?
I’m unsure, read 150-153, a freeper read it on the puma site.
Also, even AFTER winning the primary, there is a long thread here about how he set up HUNDREDS of Obama offices seperate from the control & volunteers of the Democrat party in all of the key battleground states.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2108697/posts?page=194#152
The a**h*** is a freaking Hitler wannabe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.