[palmer]

The top part of the Seal (above the fold) in photo #5 shows all of the ridges and letters of the Seal to illuminated. Yet, in photo #6, only the oter ring appears to be illuminated.

The paper is at a different angle to the light. I'm still waiting for my answer on #5: was the embossing photoshopped or was the paper embossed and then photographed? The latter is the only plausible answer.

A forgery including an embossing tool is entirely possible but you would need to update your analysis to include that fact.

[Polarik]

Check the last two posts in http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts. I wrote about Factcheck's bogus Seals.

Rather than just give you specific answers, I will be finishing Part Two tomorrow. It will answer all your questions.

The paper is at a different angle to the light.

That's what you told me before. It's not It cannot be reproduced at all. The info is in PII.