Replies

Ready for more Obama obfuscation??

Now that I have shown definitive proof here why the border on the Obama COLB image looks not only different from what a real 2007 COLB border looks like, but also, that the border on this image could only have been created separately using a graphics program.

Let that sink in for a few moments before you read the next comment.

When you look at the photos taken by FactCheck, you see the exact, same border as in the Obama COLB forgery.

and

Ergo...

We now know, for sure, that since the border on the image is bogus, then all of Factcheck's photos are bogus, and were created using a color printout of the forged COLB image -- or exactly as I claimed they were back in August when these were first posted.

You can also see that the crease in the paper where the printout was folded is way too thick to be real COLB security paper (which is as thin as cheap copy paper). Once they shot the printout, they superimposed the Seal over the photo and used Photoshop to create various lighting effects to make the Seal stand out.

I used Factcheck's original, "birth_certificate_1" photo for the illustration above to prove that "Seeing is not always believing," especially with Photoshop at one's fingertips.

Here is the original Factcheck image:

You may ask, "How do I know?" Because, I've got Obama's "real Certification of Live Birth," and here are the photos to prove it:

MORE to come about Factcheck's Fraudulent "Fotos" in my Obama's Born Conspiracy, Part Two.

I forgot to add that, after four months of extensive research on what makes an image look like a forgery, apparently Factcheck took it all to heart, and recreated the forgery using proper graphical techniques that do not show signs of forging.

In their article of August 16,"Born in the U.S.A.", Factcheck made a special homage to me and my research findings when they said the following:

The scan released by the campaign shows halos around the black text, making it look (to some) as though the text might have been pasted on top of an image of security paper. But the document itself has no such halos, nor do the close-up photos we took of it. We conclude that the halo seen in the image produced by the campaign is a digital artifact from the scanning process.

Other than being referred to as "(some)," I feel deeply honored...if not fully vindicated ;-)

Thanks, Polarik and PhilDragoo. It’s easier to pick up a porcupine than let go. I planned to resign from The Ping List at midnight last night, but, there are a few loose ends we should try to settle.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2123682/posts?page=42#42

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2123682/posts?page=43#43

“He might, for all we’ve seen, have been conceived in Cuba, delivered in Kenya”
(Cuba? Are we getting closer to a Malcolm X connection, or not?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2123682/posts?page=44#44