Posted on 10/11/2008 1:40:00 PM PDT by SatinDoll
Many of us have been wondering — “What the heck would happen?”
What would happen if Obama’s birth status is, in fact, undermined? Styria put a lot of thought into what the Consititution has to say about such matters:
Ineligibility for the Styria Presidency (Obama’s Birth Certificate — by Styria
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2103327/posts?page=7
More links I’ll tag on a future ping:
Barack Obama’s Involvement With ACORN Unearthed, Missing Article Discovered
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103671/posts
7-YR.-OLD GETS AN ACORN VOTE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2103663/posts?page=1
“Barack Obama’s money machine is fueled by the likes of Martha Murphy, a grandmother who has donated 104 times for a total of $2,475.34.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103664/posts
Why The Friends You Make Matter (ACORNucopia)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103661/posts
“It turns out that ACORN is so crooked, the press is starting to call the group ‘controversial’! In fact, ACORN is so crawling with fraudsters, it gets funding from Congress.” [snip] [Is he channelling Ann Coulter? I love that kind of quip.]
Zimbabwe — Cathy Buckle — We need seed
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103670/posts
“Corsi is supposed to be arriving back in the US today from the UK. He was doing something there (don’t know what)”
Perhaps doing some research on the former Colony of Kenya, such as looking at whatever records the UK holds, state department (who came into the country on what passports), births, etc.
No, the horse ain't dead. Keep reading in the same article:
"The 1940 Statute also provided for more stringent requirements for prior residence where, at the time of the child's birth, one of the parents was a U.S. citizen and the other was an alien. On or after January 13, 1941, in the case of a child born to a U.S. citizen parent and an alien parent, the U.S. citizen parent had to have resided in the United States or its outlying possessions for 10 years, at least 5 of which were after attaining the age of 16 years in order to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child."
At the time of his birth, his mother did not reside in the the U.S. for 5 years after her 16th birthday. She was only 18 when Barack was born.
Bookmarked —
Links I’ll add to future ping:
Dirty Bomb! Iranian Dirty Bomb Attack Against Israel Thwarted by Somali Pirates?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2103708/posts?page=1
Washington Times wades in on Odinga
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2103709/posts?page=1
Palin gets personal over abortion (It’s not personal to point out Obama supports killing babies)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103684/posts
Palin, Piper Booed on Ice at Flyer Game (Hateful Obama supporters so angry they boo 6 year old)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2103711/posts?page=1
I would have preferred McCain to win in a campaign before this came out. But the way the stock market is, why take the chance?
Another thing — I don’t think Hillary expects to take Obama’s place this year. It’s apparently too late in many states for her to be put on the ballot. Write-in campaigns are pathetic.
If BO steps down, Biden can still run under the same ballot. Discord among democrats. Checkmate. So, due to the unbelievable lack of DNC vetting, they might well be losing a golden opportunity to control every branch of DC, including the courts.
It seems the lovely Stanley was NOT residing in the US nor had she meet the 5 year requirement. Watch the Berg video.
A U.S. District Court judge’s decision, not affirmed on appeal, isn’t even binding on the Judge in the courtroom next door.
Unless questioned, it is likely that the states simply accepted what was on the form submitted.
.........Now THAT made me laugh....!!!
Obama is the biggest Fraud that ever cursed Our America!
I personally think that the Clintons would have used this information in the spring.....had it become available.
Hillary suspends her campaign on June 8. Hussein submits this “COLB” in late June. Then the questions begin.
Hillary is looking at 2012.
I think that it is payback time for the Clintons. They were instrumental in getting the dems the House and Senate in 2006. I think that they had a hand in the Mark Foley leak. Also, remember when Bill was being interviewed by Chris Wallace in 9/2006. Bill invaded Chris’s space and touched his leg and told him off. That was on purpose to get even more momentum. I think that the pressure was on the Clinton’s to deliver dem victories in 2006 because it will prove their value to the DNC and solidify Hillary as their nominee for 2008.
Well, along comes the 2008 primaries. Guess what? The Clintons are bulldozed over by a young senator who was not going to bow down to them. The power hungry DNC followed suite and stiff-armed the Clintons; apparently they have no more influence in the party.
Someone forgot to tell that to the Clintons.
I think that they are behind this birth certicate scandal. You are correct that it is too late for Hillary to be on the ticket. It would be too damaging as well. The public will turn on the dems after this gets out (they are supposed to vett all the candidates and check thier creds, right?).
Not only will McCain win, but the dems will likely loose the House and probably have little or no gain in the Senate.
Then the Clintons on Nov. 5th, can smerk and say to the shocked dems “See, this is what happens when you don’t pick someone with experience and has been with you for all these years.” In other words, they will be saying to the DNC, you need us and you better not cross us again in the future. The devastated dems will likely go back to them.
If Hussein would win, the Clintons would have no future or influence in the DNC. Furthermore, Hussein would veiw them as a rival and a threat to 2012 and would attempt to damage them further. The Clintons most certainly do not want Hussein to win.
With the scenario I describe above, Hussein’s political career would likely be finished, Polosei (in the minority) may not even get to be minority leader; her influence would be cut in half. (Keep in mind these two are the biggest threats to the Clintons). In one fell swoop, the Clintons would get them out of the way.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate"
This is a pretty strong admission on the face of it by the Obamaites that Obama must have been issued a Kenyan birth certificate when he was born there in Kenya exactly 21 years earlier to the day -- August 4, 1961.
Suits me...Biden vs. Palin!
Oh yes, I’ve copied myself too as others have. I was just adding to the reason for that long blog thread.
>>>Also was it posted as a thread article, or in a post?
I remember it as a post on a thread. I believe it was around May or June. I *think* pissant started the thread. It was a blog post on the Birth Certificate.
It was added to that thread. That was not when it originally got posted. That USAfricaonline article was the actual basis for the Obama campaign orginally releasing the COLB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.