Secondly, Steve also pulled the version of Michele's COLB that I modified to serve as my Kos clone. He pulled it off my Photobucket account, and did not read my blog post where I specifically said that it was made to look like that.
Rather than ask me what was the image used for, he erroneously assumed that it was one of my original copies of Michele's COLB.
So, now, what you're "proving" to everyone else here, is that you don't know what the hell you're talking about, and you're making a fool of yourself in the process.
It's patently obvious that you never bothered to resd my blog, either, so allow me to take you to school.
THIS, birdbrain, is what came directly from the original Michele scan, without any modifications. 
Looks quite different, doesn't it?
Here's the same word pulled from Obama's COLB:
Any one who tells you that these are not what I say they are`is flat-out lying, and I can prove it.
Here's the double "SS" pulled from the Obama COLB, and pay close atention to it:
These are NOT scanner artifacts or JPG artifacts, and YOU will NEVER be able to produce this pattern using ANY scanner or ANY JPG compression.
Do you get that? Do I need to type it again?
So, bottom line is that you don't know Jack about images. You can't even understand what a COLB is. And, you think that you're going to best me by using someone else's failed attempts at debunking my work? Especially when you have no clue as to what it means?
I'd say that you have no business talking about images, period.