To: Polarik
Computer printout or photocopy, notwithstanding, many people were still aggitated by the apparent lack of visually recognizable features on the Obama COLB that would attest to its validity, such as an embossed seal, official signatures, and a date stamp as shown in the images above. Keep in mind that the public was shown only one scanned image of Obama's alleged COLB, and that was its front side. Had a scan of the reverse side been made, the questions about the absence of seals and stamps would have been answered. Was there a change in personnel about the time of Obama's birth which would be indicated on the COLB by virtue of the signatories? If so this would enable someone in the know to date the certificate within the tenure of the signatories, and might prove the undoing of the claim of DOB.
45 posted on
09/21/2008 1:30:09 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Smokin' Joe
Was there a change in personnel about the time of Obama's birth which would be indicated on the COLB by virtue of the signatories? If so this would enable someone in the know to date the certificate within the tenure of the signatories, and might prove the undoing of the claim of DOB. Hawaii has become extremely tight-lipped about anything having to do with BHO. Onaka has been the only State Registrar that Hawaii has had since they became a state in 1959.
We'll just need to see what happens when Berg's motion for discovery is responded to.
49 posted on
09/21/2008 7:24:14 AM PDT by
Polarik
("The Greater Evil")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson