Skip to comments.
McCain/Clinton War Party Fusion Ticket
March 11, 2008
| Mark Karlin
Posted on 08/23/2008 5:31:35 PM PDT by Yosemitest
WARNING: BARF ALERT (From a liberal website)
When it Comes to the Vice-Presidency, Should Hillary Run on a McCain Ticket?
March 11, 2008
It is the one inviolable rule of party politics;
Don't promote the other party's candidate at the expense of your own.
In the past couple of weeks, Senator Hillary Clinton has violated that cardinal rule again and again as she personally vouched for the readiness of John McCain to assume the presidency, while belittling Barack Obama as nothing more than a speech.
Here is perhaps the most devastating gift she gave to the Republicans as she patronizingly dismissed Obama:
"I think that since we now know Sen. McCain will be the nominee for the Republican Party, national security will be front and center in this election. We all know that. And I think its imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander-in-chief threshold,
the New York senator told reporters crowded into an infants bedroom-sized hotel conference room in Washington.
I believe that Ive done that. Certainly, Sen. McCain has done that and youll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,
she said. Calling McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee a good friend and a
distinguished man with a great history of service to our country,
Clinton said, Both of us will be on that stage having crossed that threshold.
Clinton couldn't stop herself from praising McCain: The pro-McCain comments were quickly and widely panned so Clinton repeated them.
James Fallows reported on Wednesday,
"In a live CNN interview just now, Sen. Clinton repeated, twice, the 'Sen. McCain has a lifetime of experience, I have a lifetime of experience, Sen. Obama has one speech in 2002'
line. By what logic, exactly, does a member of the Democratic party include the 'Sen. McCain has a lifetime of experience'
part of that sentence?"
Eric Zorn, a normally low-key columnist for the Chicago Tribune, reacted with uncharacteristic alarm:
"Last week, I posted twice on a statement by Hillary Clinton that struck me as one of the lowest and most destructive things I've ever heard one candidate say about a rival candidate in the same party."
Former Senator Gary Hart was one of the many long-term party activists who was appalled by Clinton's pumping up of John McCain while patronizingly dismissing Barack Obama. He decried her comments:
By saying that only she and John McCain are qualified to lead the country, particularly in times of crisis, Hillary Clinton has broken that rule, severely damaged the Democratic candidate who may well be the party's nominee, and, perhaps most ominously, revealed the unlimited lengths to which she will go to achieve power. She has essentially said that the Democratic party deserves to lose unless it nominates her.
Former presidential candidate and Senator Bill Bradley was quoted in a London newspaper:
Bradley believes that Clinton will stop at nothing to tear down Obama even if it boosts John McCain, who was confirmed last week as the Republican nominee: "The Clintons do not do long-term planning. Theyre total tacticians and right now their focus is on Obama, not McCain."
Bill Clinton presaged the strategy of his wife when he noted a few weeks ago that Senator Clinton and Senator McCain had deep respect for each other and would run a civilized campaign.
We don't know what Senator Clinton's criteria are for the crossing "the commander-in-chief threshold." The Chicago Tribune pretty much debunked Clinton's scant claims to foreign policy and military experience, and McCain wants to bomb Iran and continue the war in Iraq for a hundred years. What allowed McCain and Clinton to cross that threshold? It appears to be poor judgment in foreign policy as far as their Senate careers are concerned.
We'll be further exploring the Clinton-McCain connection in foreign policy and D.C. establishment ties in tomorrow's BuzzFlash Editor's Blog, "Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama and Judgment Day."
Oh, and if you'd like to print out the McCain-Clinton for President and Vice President campaign button, just click here and print. .....
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; clinton; democrat; hillary; mccain; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: dayglored
Unfortunately, that investigation she is currently under probably nixes that idea.
To: Yosemitest
Since McCain isn’t against choosing a democRAT for his running mate, I’ll bet he chooses Joe Biden.
That gives him the “crossovers” he’s looking for, and it removes one person campaigning against him.
22
posted on
08/23/2008 6:31:16 PM PDT
by
wolfpat
(If you don't like the Patriot Act, you're really gonna hate Sharia Law.)
To: Yosemitest
"... and McCain wants to bomb Iran and continue the war in Iraq for a hundred years."
You were right. This IS written by a Lib!
23
posted on
08/23/2008 6:36:46 PM PDT
by
sofaman
(Obama Bin Biden '08)
To: Yosemitest
An old post of mine...
A lot depends on who McCain picks for a running mate.
He wants someone who will make him look like a moderate
Someone who will appeal to women voters
Someone who can steal democrat votes from Obama
He wants to be bi-partisain, and "reach across the aisle"
(And if he really DID pick the Hildabeast for a running mate we'd STILL have people here trying to convince us it would be better than voting for Obama)...
24
posted on
08/23/2008 6:37:25 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Libation Theology - I believe I'll have another drink...)
To: Mr. Silverback
“Hes more likely to pick Paris Hilton than Hillary.”
Paris Hilton will be Secretary of Energy.
25
posted on
08/23/2008 6:43:53 PM PDT
by
devere
To: wolfpat
I thought it'd be another Joe, ... Joe Lieberman. (Liarman)
26
posted on
08/23/2008 6:49:26 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: JillValentine
Quote:If McCain picked her for VP and stepped down in 2012, and Hillary won the 2012 Dem nomination, we could have a female vs. female* presidential race and the nation could see once and for all how different conservative women are from liberal women.
*butch
YEAH!!!! MUD RASSLIN!!!!
To: Republican Wildcat
You know, back durig the primaries (when I was opposed to McCain) I remember seeing that pic of him and Hillary smiling at each other posted in a lot of threads. And you know, it doesn’t mean crap. If I got photographed as much as McCain there’s be pics of me smiling at some of the local Dems...they’re jerks but I’m not going to pretend they aren’t human and stomp around like a sulky baby. As for Hillary, how many fake smiles do you think are crossing that mug every day?
28
posted on
08/23/2008 6:52:36 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
To: sofaman
But it's
still funny.
29
posted on
08/23/2008 6:53:17 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Yosemitest
Yeah...right!
Your MDS has reallly messed with your ability to think. Even if McCain secretly wanted Hillary on the ticket (I highly doubt it) he would know that there's not a chance he'd win the election.
30
posted on
08/23/2008 6:54:39 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
To: null and void
"we'd STILL have people here
trying to convince us
it would be better than voting for Obama"
... VERY well said!!!
31
posted on
08/23/2008 6:57:45 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Yosemitest
That would be the end of the GOP and the birth of the American Conservative Party.
Then again, the way so many Freepers are running around promoting this RINO, nothing would surprise me at this point.
32
posted on
08/23/2008 6:57:55 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
To: Yosemitest
We may yet find out if it’s accurate...
33
posted on
08/23/2008 7:05:10 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Libation Theology - I believe I'll have another drink...)
To: Mr. Silverback
We don't
have to take "McCain" anymore.
There are more Hillary supporters, than there are McCain supporters.
Only 67 percent of the primary voters ...
voted for someone other than McCain, in the Republican party.
34
posted on
08/23/2008 7:08:15 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: JillValentine
McCain is never going to pick Hillary. She’s too far to the right of him...
35
posted on
08/23/2008 7:13:28 PM PDT
by
babygene
(This Government no longer works to secure our freedoms and provide for our common defense.)
To: Yosemitest
Barr? Bob Barr?
Ooooooooooookay.
36
posted on
08/23/2008 7:16:01 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
To: null and void
(And if he really DID pick the Hildabeast for a running mate we'd STILL have people here trying to convince us it would be better than voting for Obama)...
37
posted on
08/23/2008 7:17:25 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(*******It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.******)
To: ovrtaxt
The Republican Party died when we started
listening to Dick Morris and Karl Rove.
38
posted on
08/23/2008 7:28:47 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die.)
To: Mr. Silverback
39
posted on
08/23/2008 7:29:15 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Libation Theology - I believe I'll have another drink...)
To: Yosemitest
40
posted on
08/23/2008 7:30:51 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson