Um...why are we wracking our brains for insight into the factcheck photos of the purported BC? How about the fact that it’s a photo, shot at a distance at an angle, and not a high res scan? Not even a close up photo of the doc is shown. The photos of the signature and seal shot in separate photos and not shown on the doc. They could be from anything. Where’s a scan?
By using photos, they are preventing analysis by doc examiners. The left is always doing whatever they can for plausible deniability...even if it’s implausible. If Obama had a certified copy of his BC, he would be shoving it down out rightwing throats with a B-52. But he’s not. The absence of a high res scan of the complete doc precludes the need for any further analysis..
But but but the Obama apologists say that Obama is using this as subterfuge and he will spring his "real birth certificate" at the right moment to discredit all his distracters. LoL!
If I did not have a pair of 2007 COLBs, I'd be asking for them, too. But, you read the list of things that I found on it which were not on the image. in reality, the downloadable photos are large enough AND show plenty of detail for me.
Try downloading them from the list they posted in the aidebar.