Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FactCheck's photos of Obama's birth certificate just proved that their posted image of it was forged
The Greater Evil ^ | 08/21/2008 | Polarik

Posted on 08/22/2008 7:51:31 PM PDT by Polarik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Red Steel
The "embossed" seal doesn't need to be present on documents "signed by computer" in multi-colored ink.

Some "seals", which make people happy even if they're not really all that useful anymore, are frequently printed right with the other information.

41 posted on 08/22/2008 9:20:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Ya know, I’d be real happy if the technogeek squad (that has been working on this for a year now) could continue casting doubt on BO’s methical origins. But it is equally useful to expose the Annenberg foundation factcheck scam and connection to BO and Ayers. Charge on ladies and gents. May God be with you.


42 posted on 08/22/2008 9:20:53 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; All
thanks, Lucy. Just posting this here to remind everybody of the connections:

Behind the Annenberg Gate: Inside the Chicago Annenberg Challenge Records (Obama and Ayers) Global Labor and Politics ^ | 8/20/2008 | Steve Diamond

Inside the Chicago Annenberg Challenge for a Closer Look.Ernest_at_the_Beach #26

“...And it comes down to this… Obama and Ayers together controlled $160 mil in cash. Unfortunately the only ultimate beneficiaries from all this cash ended up being their political friends.


43 posted on 08/22/2008 9:27:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Polarik
Thanks for the ping Lucy...

Polarik, I think because it's getting late, and also because I've not followed your insights/revelations on a continual basis...I'm having trouble understanding the images of the certificate that you posted. I understand the list of observations, but I'm not sure which image I shall find them on, and what image to compare them too. Forgive my confusion..and THANK YOU for all of your hard work. Big Freeper BUMP

44 posted on 08/22/2008 9:29:58 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: igoramus08
Can you do FOI request on the Obama’s certificate number for all the details in the birth certificate?

Want to get the court order? I think that it can be argued successfully that Obama and FactCheck have put the information in the public domain, and therefore, Hawaii, can no longer claim that it is protected by the Nat'l Privacy Act or their4 own rules for disclosing individually-identifiable information.

I thiknk that we should go for the Letter of Verificatrion

45 posted on 08/22/2008 9:31:28 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Well my BC is not computer generated it’s typed with a human signature.


46 posted on 08/22/2008 9:34:48 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

PS: Why are there faded ghost type of numbers letters behind the letters and numbers on the images?


47 posted on 08/22/2008 9:40:00 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
"Here's the overlay of the FactCheck COLB image placed on top of the PD COLB image."

I am a little confused here. If FC COLB (Obama's) is placed on top of PD COLB (Patricia DeCosta's) why are we seeing Patricia DeCosta's certificate number and not Obama's? Which supposedly is: 151-1961-010641

48 posted on 08/22/2008 9:43:59 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

I went to your website, and NOW i understand the overlay..and spunky just confirmed it. Never mind to that question. :)

I’ve sent the link to your website to everyone on my email list...they are DEFINITELY interested in this.


49 posted on 08/22/2008 9:47:20 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; LucyT; Spunky

Have you already read this?
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/10/the-buzz-about-baracks-birth-certificate/


50 posted on 08/22/2008 9:51:15 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: igoramus08
Can you do FOI request on the Obama’s certificate number for all the details in the birth certificate?

Want to get the court order? I think that it can be argued successfully that Obama and FactCheck have put the information in the public domain, and therefore, Hawaii, can no longer claim that it is protected by the Nat'l Privacy Act or their4 own rules for disclosing individually-identifiable information.

I thiknk that we should go for the Letter of Verificatrion

51 posted on 08/22/2008 10:01:30 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Virtually all birth records are maintained in electronic data bases (or on CDs), and as needed documents are created based on the information contained in them. That's a worldwide phenomenon too.

All excellent points. Maybe the Obama campaign and FactCheck should also read them, because they continue to call that JPG forgery, Obama's "original birth certificate."

The only thing that would be original is if all of the information printed on this "obviously recent copy" of a document allegedly printed more than a year old, is exactly what is in Hawaii's database right now or in a sealed envelope that they were compelled to open.

52 posted on 08/22/2008 10:07:21 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

If you go to my blog, if and when you have the time, read through my very first post, “Was Obama’s birth certificate manufactured,” then the next to last post, “The Smoking Cannon,” that should be enough to get you caught up.

But, feel free to email me with your questions.

Ron Polarik


53 posted on 08/22/2008 10:12:59 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
PS: Why are there faded ghost type of numbers letters behind the letters and numbers on the images?

Because the FactCheck folks at first thought that they would undermine my theory about what they called, white halos around the letters" Which was not an accurate description of my theory.

But, then, I guess they thought it more prudent to say, "There ain't no halos on this document," and write the whole thing off as "scanner artifacts."

54 posted on 08/22/2008 10:16:55 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Here's the overlay of the FactCheck COLB image placed on top of the PD COLB image."

I am a little confused here. If FC COLB (Obama's) is placed on top of PD COLB (Patricia DeCosta's) why are we seeing Patricia DeCosta's certificate number and not Obama's? Which supposedly is: 151-1961-010641

When I say, "FactCheck COLB image," I am talking about the image they posted on their website, June 16, four days after both the Daily Kos and FTD posted theirs. This image had the certificate number covered by a black rectangle.

The photos, on the other hand, now show us that the BIRTH YEAR (1961) is the number that follows "151-" on all certification numbers printed after November 2001.

55 posted on 08/22/2008 10:21:29 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Have you already read this? http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/10/the-buzz-about-baracks-birth-certificate Yes, more than two months ago.
56 posted on 08/22/2008 10:33:23 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Welcome to America's Least Wanted

57 posted on 08/22/2008 10:34:51 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I’ve sent the link to your website to everyone on my email list...they are DEFINITELY interested in this.

Oh, thank you and bless you!! Ron Polarik

58 posted on 08/22/2008 10:37:31 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

flag.


59 posted on 08/22/2008 10:52:16 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
"When I say, "FactCheck COLB image," I am talking about the image they posted on their website, June 16,...

Thanks! That clears it up for me. I was thinking you were using the newest COLB FactCheck just posted.

I caught on to the certificate numbers sometime back after seeing different COLB. I figured out that they all began with 151, then the birthyear. So I knew Barack's if real would have to be 151-1961-something.

60 posted on 08/22/2008 10:53:24 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson