sinclair has used Free Republic to make scurrilous claims (including conspiracy to murder)against obama without the slightest bit of evidence.
WorldNet Daily refuses him access saying that they are tired of being used by him. Every other venue has cast him out. He claims that it is the obama forces that made this happen but again offers no proof, just his word which has no value.
I believe that it is sinclair's game to get a pay day out of his story through the Enquirer. That is why he (with the assist of his Freeper friends) are pushing the Enquirer here.
The freepers who shill for sinclair are differently motivated. They so desperately want his story to be true that they willfully ignore both his history and his failure to provide any proof. They are fools. Anybody who buys into a known career criminal's game is a fool. But, the sinclairs of the world need such people....it's just a shame that he has found so many here.
As for the lack of response from obama being said to indicate that he is afraid of what must be true, well, that's just ridiculous. The dumbest thing obama could do in this case would be to address unsubstantiated accusations.
.
I still believe that there is something to the Sinclair story.
There have been rumors floating around for a long time- long before Larry ever came on the scene.
There was the article (which I can no longer find- scrubbed by the Obama machine?) about Obama’s CLOSE boyhood mentor, a Communist professor. A professor who had been in trouble before for activities with underage boys- a professor who had a preference for ‘little brown boys’.
Are you listening, larry?
.
P.S. - So, actually, I’m with Larry on this small point: I sincerely hope the Enquirer gets involved. It’s the best way to either dismiss Larry, or vindicate him - one way or the other, we’ll know for sure.